A The standardized and unstandardized canonical correlation coefficients

Click For Summary
Standardized canonical correlation coefficients are calculated by normalizing the variables, allowing for comparison across different scales, while unstandardized coefficients reflect the raw relationships between the variables without scaling. The standardized coefficients provide insights into the strength of the relationship in a standardized context, whereas unstandardized coefficients indicate the actual magnitude of the relationship. The distinction is crucial for interpreting results in canonical correlation analysis, as standardized coefficients are often more useful for understanding the relative importance of variables. Canonical correlation analysis in SPSS 27 outputs both types of coefficients, enabling researchers to choose the most appropriate for their analysis. Understanding these differences enhances the interpretation of the relationships between sets of variables.
Ad VanderVen
Messages
169
Reaction score
13
TL;DR
What exactly are the standardized and unstandardized canonical correlation coefficients and what is the difference between them?
The output of SPSS 27 Canonical Correlation gives the standardized and unstandardized canonical correlation coefficients.

What exactly are the standardized and unstandardized canonical correlation coefficients and what is the difference between them?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
standardized:
$$
\operatorname{cov}\left(\dfrac{X-\mu_X}{\sigma_X}\, , \,\dfrac{Y-\mu_Y}{\sigma_Y}\right)=\dfrac{1}{\sigma_X\,\sigma_Y}\,\operatorname{cov}(X,Y)
$$

unstandardized:
##\operatorname{cov}(X,Y)##
 
fresh_42 said:
standardized:
$$
\operatorname{cov}\left(\dfrac{X-\mu_X}{\sigma_X}\, , \,\dfrac{Y-\mu_Y}{\sigma_Y}\right)=\dfrac{1}{\sigma_X\,\sigma_Y}\,\operatorname{cov}(X,Y)
$$

unstandardized:
##\operatorname{cov}(X,Y)##

You simply define the standardized and unstandardized correlation coefficient, but we are talking about the canonical correlation coefficient here.
 
Greetings, I am studying probability theory [non-measure theory] from a textbook. I stumbled to the topic stating that Cauchy Distribution has no moments. It was not proved, and I tried working it via direct calculation of the improper integral of E[X^n] for the case n=1. Anyhow, I wanted to generalize this without success. I stumbled upon this thread here: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-to-prove-the-cauchy-distribution-has-no-moments.992416/ I really enjoyed the proof...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K