The Transformation from S to S''Relative Speed Between Frames S and S

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the transformation from frame S to frame S'' moving at +0.5c relative to S', which is also moving at +0.5c relative to S. The Lorentz transformation matrix is utilized, leading to the conclusion that the relative speed between frames S and S'' is 0.8c. Participants clarify that unlike Galilean transformations, velocities do not simply add linearly in relativistic contexts, which is a common point of confusion. The final confirmation affirms that the calculated relative speed of 0.8c is indeed correct.
Domnu
Messages
176
Reaction score
0
Problem
Write down the transformation from a frame S to a frame S' moving at +0.5 c in the x direction and then to another frame S'' moving at +0.5 c in the x direction relative to S'. What is the complete transformation from S to S''? What relative speed between frames S and S'' does your answer imply?

Answer?
Well, the Lorentz transformation matrix is just

<br /> \hat{L}=<br /> <br /> \begin{pmatrix}<br /> \gamma &amp; -\gamma\beta &amp; 0 &amp; 0\\<br /> -\gamma\beta &amp; \gamma &amp; 0 &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 1 &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 1\\<br /> \end{\pmatrix}<br />

Now, it happens that Lorentz matrices are closed under multiplication (ie \hat{L} \cdot \hat{L} = \hat{L_1}). If we let

<br /> \hat{L_1} = <br /> <br /> \begin{pmatrix}<br /> G &amp; -GB &amp; 0 &amp; 0\\<br /> -GB &amp; G &amp; 0 &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 1 &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 1\\<br /> \end{pmatrix}<br />

we find that B = 2\beta/(1+\beta^2), G = (1+\beta^2)\gamma^2. Now, since \beta = 0.5, we have that B = 0.8, so the relative speed between S and S'' would be 0.8 c. I'm a bit confused here... why wouldn't the answer just be 0.5c + 0.5c = c?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Domnu said:
I'm a bit confused here... why wouldn't the answer just be 0.5c + 0.5c = c?
That's how velocities add under Galilean transformations, not Lorentz transformations. Review the relativistic addition of velocities. (What if the speeds were 0.6c instead of 0.5c? Would you expect the total speed to be greater than c?)
 
Hmm okay, I haven't learned this yet. That's the next section in my book, heheh... but is my original answer of 0.8c correct?
 
Domnu said:
but is my original answer of 0.8c correct?
Absolutely. :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top