I The Twin Paradox implies that the Universe as a whole is a special frame

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the Twin Paradox and its implications regarding the universe as a special frame of motion, as mentioned in Martin Gardner's "Relativity Simply Explained." Participants argue that the notion of a universal frame may be a misunderstanding, emphasizing that special relativity does not require a preferred frame of reference. The complexities of non-inertial motion and the role of acceleration in the paradox are highlighted, with some suggesting that Gardner's interpretation adds unnecessary complications. Clarifications about inertial frames and the geometry of space-time are discussed, indicating that the aging difference between the twins is due to changes in velocity and the resulting lines of simultaneity. Ultimately, the conversation underscores the need for precise understanding of relativity concepts to avoid misconceptions.
  • #31
PeterDonis said:
Where have you been seeing that?
uh, right here? For one.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
thetrellan said:
uh, right here? For one.
Pervect isn't saying what you are saying, though - in fact he explicitly says "the one that undergoes inertial motion will have the longest elapsed time on their clock". Am I correct in my interpretation above, that you are reading his Euclidean length analogy as saying the traveller should be older? Because that's a difference between Euclidean and Minkowski geometry.
 
  • #33
thetrellan said:
uh, right here? For one.

@pervect says exactly the opposite:

pervect said:
if two twins take different routes and meet up again, the one that undergoes inertial motion will have the longest elapsed time on their clock

The one that undergoes inertial motion is the stay-at-home twin, not the traveling twin.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
5K
  • · Replies 115 ·
4
Replies
115
Views
8K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K