The uncertainty operator and Heisenberg

dyn
Messages
774
Reaction score
63
In deriving the Heisenberg uncertainty relation for 2 general Hermitian operators A and B , the uncertainty operators ΔA and ΔB are introduced defined by ΔA=A - (expectation value of A) and similarly for B.
My question is this - how can you subtract(or add) an expectation value , which is just a number to A which is an operator ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A number is also an operator. But you can also see it by the variance being <A.A>-<A>2, where <A.A> is a number and <A> is a number.

<(A-<A>)2>
= <A.A-2<A>A+<A>2>
= <A.A>-<2<A>A>+<<A>2>
= <A.A>-2<A><A>+<<A>2>
= <A.A>-<A>2
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
There's an implicit identity operator multiplying ##\langle A \rangle##.
 
That's sloppy and indeed misleading notation. The unit operator on the states' space is not written when scaled by the expectation value.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...

Similar threads

Back
Top