The use of Riccati equations in optimal control theory

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the formulation of linear control theory using matrix Riccati equations, specifically the equations ##\dot{x}=Ax+Bu## and ##\dot{u}=Cx+Du##. It highlights that rewriting these equations as a matrix differential equation allows for easier solutions through diagonalization techniques. The advantage of this approach lies in its accessibility to useful mathematical methods for solving control problems. A participant shares a review paper that may provide additional insights into the topic. Overall, the use of Riccati equations in optimal control theory enhances problem-solving efficiency.
John Finn
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
I know that linear control theory, in the form ##\dot{x}=Ax+Bu##, ##\dot{u}=Cx+Du##, can be put in the form of a matrix Riccati equation. But is there really an advantage to doing so?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Thread moved.
 
John Finn said:
I know that linear control theory, in the form ##\dot{x}=Ax+Bu##, ##\dot{u}=Cx+Du##, can be put in the form of a matrix Riccati equation. But is there really an advantage to doing so?
I don't know anything about linear control theory or matrix Riccati equations, but the above looks like linear algebra as it relates to systems of differential equations, which I do know something about.
Assuming A, B, C, and D are constants, the two equations above can be rewritten in this form:
##\begin{bmatrix}\dot x \\ \dot u \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix}A & B \\ C & D \end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix} x \\ u \end{bmatrix}##

The advantage of writing the system in this form is that this matrix differential equation can be solved for x and u by diagonalizing the 2 x 2 matrix I wrote using standard techniques.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top