The Volume Of A Layer Of Lead Of Uniform Thickness(word problem)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the volume of a layer of lead shielding around a rectangular prism container. The dimensions of the container are given as 2m by 3m by 4m, and the volume of the shielding is modeled as a function of its uniform thickness, represented as t. The derived formula for the volume of the lead layer is V(t) = (4+2t)(3+2t)(2+2t) - 24. Participants confirm the correctness of the approach and emphasize the importance of ensuring the equation behaves logically, particularly as thickness approaches zero. The overall consensus is that the solution is sound and straightforward, with no significant issues identified.
Plutonium88
Messages
173
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A container in the form of a rectangular prism measuring 2m by 3m by 4m is covered with a layer of lead shielding of uniform thickness. Model the volume of the shielding as a function of its thickness. Treat the shelding as a hollow rectangular prism. DO NOT SIMPLIFY.



Homework Equations


V=lxwxh


The Attempt at a Solution



I found

l = 4m w = 3m h = 2m

when i drew each shape as a 2d shape. I noticed that the layer of lead was an equal (Uniform) layer around. So i labeled one unit of thickness, as t.

Thus all sides ended up having a layer on either side...

i came to conclude that the new measurements were.

L2=4 + 2t W2= 3 + 2t H2 = 2 + 2t

and since its hollow..

V(t) = L2*W2*H2 - Lwh

V(t) = (4+2t)(3+2t)(2+2t) - 4*3*2 <====(Or 24)




Can anyone tell me if this solution appears to be correct, and also point me out if I'm forgetting where any layers thickness maybe ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks fine to me.
 
I think your answer looks good. I think you chose what your variable represented nicely and set up your function good. You can always check yourself in these situations to see if your answer makes sense. Does your equation make sense? In this case, the volume of the thickness should approach 0 as t approaches zero, and it does; so your equation seems reasonable.

Only "qualm" I would have is that you "found" l, h, and w. It would be better to let l, h, and w be the values they are, unless they specifically gave you equations for finding them. Just a little nitpick, I'm sure your teacher won't mind but it just makes it a little more rigorous.

But, again, for word problems there is usually a way to check and see if your solution makes sense. Let something get really small or really big and see if the answer makes sense, in this case it does!
 
scurty said:
I think your answer looks good. I think you chose what your variable represented nicely and set up your function good. You can always check yourself in these situations to see if your answer makes sense. Does your equation make sense? In this case, the volume of the thickness should approach 0 as t approaches zero, and it does; so your equation seems reasonable.

Only "qualm" I would have is that you "found" l, h, and w. It would be better to let l, h, and w be the values they are, unless they specifically gave you equations for finding them. Just a little nitpick, I'm sure your teacher won't mind but it just makes it a little more rigorous.

But, again, for word problems there is usually a way to check and see if your solution makes sense. Let something get really small or really big and see if the answer makes sense, in this case it does!



Thanks a lot guys i really appreciate it.

and so in terms of what you're saying with the approaching business.

i would know my answer shouldn't be correct if it was a negative number, cause volume can't be negative?

or like, can you explain to me a little more in depthly abuot the approaching bussiness and the equation.?
 
Plutonium88 said:
Thanks a lot guys i really appreciate it.

and so in terms of what you're saying with the approaching business.

i would know my answer shouldn't be correct if it was a negative number, cause volume can't be negative?

or like, can you explain to me a little more in depthly abuot the approaching bussiness and the equation.?

I'm not sure there's really much you need to check. It's a straighforward problem and you did it in a straightforward way. I really wouldn't worry about it.
 
Dick said:
I'm not sure there's really much you need to check. It's a straighforward problem and you did it in a straightforward way. I really wouldn't worry about it.

Yea you`re right no need to complicate things. I Really appreciate that you checked my answer and for your input man. It means a lot to me man keep up the great help man.
 
Back
Top