Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The weak SU(2) instanton proposed by Belavin Polyakov Schwarz and Tyupkin

  1. Sep 26, 2012 #1
    I ran accross the following passage in the Wikipedia article on mass-energy equivalence:

    This level of physics is way over my head, but I'm wondering: "What happens to the quarks that comprise the protons and neutrons?" Are they conserved in the neutrinos and antielectrons?

    Chris
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 26, 2012 #2

    Ben Niehoff

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    LOL, what? You don't need instantons. Just the weak force will do. The W and Z bosons couple to quarks, leptons, and neutrinos, allowing those three to be interconverted.

    Instantons are something else entirely...a useful tool for calculating the path integral of a gauge theory in the saddle point approximation.
     
  4. Sep 26, 2012 #3
    It's not that simple. You cannot annihilate the quarks in protons and neutrons into leptons, since none of them are anti-quarks. The Standard Model conserves total lepton number.

    ...except for some business to do with chiral anomalies, which is connected back to instantons, which I understand to be indeed important for baryogenesis.
     
  5. Sep 27, 2012 #4
    So now my question is:"Is the process described in the Wikipedia article accepted (theoretical) physics?" It seems that it's not well known to kuros and Ben Niehoff (thanks for your replies).

    I'm wondering if this process, if it's real, might be one possible fate for matter subjected to the extreme conditions at (or immediately before) the point of a black hole singularity.

    Chris
     
  6. Sep 28, 2012 #5
    I believe it is well known to those who study baryogenesis. I am not one of these people, however. What I am saying is that I am inclined to believe wikipedia on this one :p.

    And to comment on your initial question ("What happens to the quarks that comprise the protons and neutrons? Are they conserved in the neutrinos and antielectrons?"), no the quarks are certainly not 'conserved' in the lepton products, these are all fundamental particles; leptons cannot 'contain' quarks. So this process indeed violates conservation rules as they are understood in the Standard Model (baryon/lepton number conservation), however these are perturbative rules, that only apply to evaluating Feynman diagrams and the like. Instantons are a non-perturbative phenomenon (so we cannot write down a feynman diagram for this process you are talking about), and so they have some room to violate these perturbative rules, but I don't know any more details than that.
     
  7. Oct 1, 2012 #6
    Thanks, Kuros, for your reply. I'm clearly over my head on this so it won't serve any purpose for me to speculate any further. At this point I'll accept that the author of the Wikipedia article knows what he or she is talking about.

    If anyone in Physics Forums is familiar with this process I would be interested in a layman's explanation of how it works (if that's possible). At this point it seems that under extreme conditions it has significance in baryogenesis and, possibly, in the reverse process as well.

    Chris
     
  8. Oct 1, 2012 #7
    I also would like a layman's explanation! It seems like dark magic to me at the moment.
     
  9. Oct 2, 2012 #8

    tom.stoer

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Perhaps this wikipedia page plus references may help

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sphaleron

    The idea behind these sphalerons is that they induce baryon-number non-conservation. Think about a potential V(x) looking like a cosine V(x) = V cos(x); to every minimum you assign a 'quantum number' n counting the minima at xn = nπ (for n = ±1, ±3, ...).

    A sphaleron induces something like a tunneling between vacua n → n' = n±2. This n of our simplified model is something like the baryon number.
     
  10. Oct 2, 2012 #9
    Dark magic, indeed. From a layman's point of view this process certainly seems to be one of those quantum physics ideas that is "way out there". The description that comes closest to a layman's explanation that I can find is contained in a May, 1993 paper by Glennys R. Farrar and M. E. Shaposhnikov entitled "Baryon Asymmetry of the Universe in the Minimal Standard Model", which can be found here:
    http://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-ph/9305274v1.pdf

    The passage that I think summarizes the essence of the idea is found on page 5.

    Once again, I wonder if this process is one possible fate of matter as it approaches a black hole singularity. Like most laymen, it is hard for me to imagine the "stuff" of 3 or 4 suns (let alone 3 or 4 million suns) squashed into a point. Somehow it seems more imaginable if all that stuff is in the form of energetic photons and antineutrinos.

    Chris
     
  11. Oct 3, 2012 #10
    The above excerpt from my previous post should have read "...energetic photons and neutrinos...". The energetic photons would be from both the process itself and from the annihilation of the antielectrons produced with the original electrons comprising the matter.

    Chris
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: The weak SU(2) instanton proposed by Belavin Polyakov Schwarz and Tyupkin
Loading...