The Young Double-Slit Experiment

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the Young double-slit experiment, focusing on the differences between interference patterns produced by double slits and diffraction gratings, as well as the effects of using white light in these experiments. Participants explore theoretical aspects, mathematical formulations, and implications of these optical phenomena.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that double slit interference involves two distinct paths, while diffraction involves many paths through a single slit, leading to different mathematical treatments and behaviors.
  • There is a discussion about the observation of fringes with monochromatic light, where spacing is equal in terms of sin θ, but not necessarily in terms of distance on a screen, especially as one moves away from the center.
  • Some participants suggest that with white light, the central fringe remains white while side fringes produce a rainbow pattern, with increasing spread as one moves away from the center.
  • A participant questions whether the original poster meant to refer to single slit diffraction instead of diffraction grating, suggesting a possible clarification is needed.
  • Another participant mentions a paper they wrote that quantitatively describes the spreading of fringes in the double slit experiment.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of the fringes produced by diffraction gratings versus double slits, and there is no consensus on whether the original question was correctly interpreted regarding the type of diffraction being discussed. The discussion remains unresolved on some points.

Contextual Notes

There are assumptions about the use of monochromatic versus white light, and the implications of fringe spacing are dependent on the definitions and contexts provided by participants. Some mathematical steps and relationships are left as exercises, indicating potential gaps in the discussion.

PFuser1232
Messages
479
Reaction score
20
I have basically two doubts regarding diffraction and interference. First of all, according to my CIE A level Physics book, while the double slit experiment results in fringes that are more or less equally separated, a diffraction grating results in fringes that are not equally separated. Why is this the case? My second doubt is about passing white light through two slits or, any number of slits. What would be observed? Series of white light maximas and in place of dark fringes a series of spectra? (The 7 constituent colours).
 
Science news on Phys.org
You mean you have two questions regarding diffraction and interference.

1st question: When talking about the fringes of the double slit experiment we are considering the interference between two paths that go through different slits and are quite different from each other. Only two paths need to be considered. When talking about diffraction fringes we are considering the interference between many slightly different paths that go through the same slit. The math here involves solving an integral - as opposed to simply adding two waves. These are physically quite different situations and there should be no surprise that they lead to quite different behaviors.

2nd question: If white light is used for those experiments, the central fringe will remain unchanged but the side fringes will smear into a rainbow pattern as you described. The further from the center a fringe is the more spreading one observes. This property is put to good use in spectrograph where a diffraction grating is often used to spread a light source into its spectral constituents in order to analyze the light source.
 
MohammedRady97 said:
while the double slit experiment results in fringes that are more or less equally separated, a diffraction grating results in fringes that are not equally separated. Why is this the case?

Assuming we are using monochromatic light (single wavelength), in both cases the fringes are equally spaced in terms of sin θ, as can be seen from the equation nλ = d sin θ.

If you view the fringes on a flat screen the distance of a fringe from the center of the screen is x = L tan θ where L is the distance from the slits or grating to the screen. I leave it as an exercise to work out a formula for x in terms of n. You'll find that in general, the spacing between values of x for successive values of n is not equal. However, if x (or θ) is small, the spacing is very nearly equal.

Double slit experiments usually have relatively large values of d (the slit spacing), and you usually have many closely-spaced fringes. Near the center of the pattern they are practically equally spaced. Far from the center they start to "spread out".

With diffraction gratings d is usually much smaller, and the values of x are larger, so you get fewer fringes, spaced further apart, and the difference in spacing becomes easily evident.
 
dauto said:
You mean you have two questions regarding diffraction and interference.

1st question: When talking about the fringes of the double slit experiment we are considering the interference between two paths that go through different slits and are quite different from each other. Only two paths need to be considered. When talking about diffraction fringes we are considering the interference between many slightly different paths that go through the same slit. The math here involves solving an integral - as opposed to simply adding two waves. These are physically quite different situations and there should be no surprise that they lead to quite different behaviors.

2nd question: If white light is used for those experiments, the central fringe will remain unchanged but the side fringes will smear into a rainbow pattern as you described. The further from the center a fringe is the more spreading one observes. This property is put to good use in spectrograph where a diffraction grating is often used to spread a light source into its spectral constituents in order to analyze the light source.

Does that mean that a white maximum would only be observed at the centre? And the rest of the screen would be basically showing repeating rainbow patterns?
 
Look at the picture near the bottom of the page, in UltrafastPED's first link.
 
jtbell said:
Assuming we are using monochromatic light (single wavelength), in both cases the fringes are equally spaced in terms of sin θ, as can be seen from the equation nλ = d sin θ.

If you view the fringes on a flat screen the distance of a fringe from the center of the screen is x = L tan θ where L is the distance from the slits or grating to the screen. I leave it as an exercise to work out a formula for x in terms of n. You'll find that in general, the spacing between values of x for successive values of n is not equal. However, if x (or θ) is small, the spacing is very nearly equal.

Double slit experiments usually have relatively large values of d (the slit spacing), and you usually have many closely-spaced fringes. Near the center of the pattern they are practically equally spaced. Far from the center they start to "spread out".

With diffraction gratings d is usually much smaller, and the values of x are larger, so you get fewer fringes, spaced further apart, and the difference in spacing becomes easily evident.

He said diffraction grating but I think he meant single slit diffraction. The question makes more sense that way. May be the OP should clarify that point?
 
MohammedRady97 said:
Does that mean that a white maximum would only be observed at the centre? And the rest of the screen would be basically showing repeating rainbow patterns?

Yes, and the further away from the center the more spread out the rainbows become. They might even start running into each other. Each rainbow might spread so much that they would overlap the neighbor rainbow creating a big mess.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
I've linked a paper I've written that quantitatively describes how the fringes of the double slit experiment spread out as distance from the center of the screen increases.

http://vixra.org/abs/1412.0163
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
21K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
6K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K