The Young's double slit exp. and some general waves

  • Thread starter WiFO215
  • Start date
  • #1
421
1

Main Question or Discussion Point

I was reading about the classic Young's double slit experiment and I had a few questions regarding secondary wavelets a.k.a Huygen's wavelets. I proceed with the following questions assuming you know the experiment.

The crucial point behind the explanation to the experiment is that light emerging from the original source, forms secondary wavelets at the 2 following slits. And from here on, books continue explaining things but I shall stop here for I have some questions.

Q1 - The secondary wavelets do not form only at the slit, but they form everywhere. Why do we consider the secondary wavelets only formed at the slit? Why not in front of it? Why not behind it?

Q2 - From the definition of secondary wavelets, I do not understand why nobody seems to discuss why they do produce a 'backlash' effect. Shouldn't the secondary wavelets travel backwards to affect the source itself and cause trouble?

The books I have come across seem to skip discussing these issues. Is there something I have not understood?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
diazona
Homework Helper
2,175
6
My understanding is that the "backlashes" of the secondary wavelets interfere with each other and with the original wavelet, so that normally all you see is a single wave propagating outwards from the source. However, when the light passes through a slit, most of the wavelets generated before the slit get blocked by the wall; it's only those wavelets which are centered in the slit itself that can propagate through. And if the slit is thin enough, it looks like just a single wavelet at each slit.

I wouldn't take the Huygens wavelet interpretation too literally, though... it's a nice way to intuitively figure out what happens at something like a slit, but verifying the details gets extremely complicated.
 
  • #3
Doc Al
Mentor
44,880
1,129
Q2 - From the definition of secondary wavelets, I do not understand why nobody seems to discuss why they do produce a 'backlash' effect. Shouldn't the secondary wavelets travel backwards to affect the source itself and cause trouble?
Read what I wrote about the obliquity factor in this thread: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=236864
 
  • #4
421
1
Thanks Doc!
 

Related Threads for: The Young's double slit exp. and some general waves

  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
9K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Top