Theorem mathematic for relativity

nulliusinverb
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
hello!:

my problem is about of a theorem mathematic,as I prove the following theorem?

F(x)=F(a) + \sum^{n}_{i=1}(x^{i}-a^{i})H_{i}(x)

good first start with the fundamental theorem of calculus: (for proof):

F(x) - F(a) = \int^{x}_{a}F'(s)ds sustitution: s=t(x - a) + a \Rightarrow [a,x] to [0,1] then:
ds=dt(x - a) later:
f(x) - F(a)= (x - a)\int^{1}_{0}F'(t(x - a) +a)dt

okk my problem is how to get to the sum \sum?

is physics relativistic forum, because of this theorem I can get to the change of coordinates in the Einstein equations and find bases for the manifolds of space-time. thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taylor_series

Your representation is a modification of the standard Taylor series representation, where Hi(a) (not Hi(x)) is related to the ith derivative of F.

Furthermore the term in parenthesis should be (x-a)i not xi - ai
 
mathman said:
Furthermore the term in parenthesis should be (x-a)i not xi - ai
I know it's not clear from what he said, but he has a different theorem in mind. Wald's statement of the theorem goes like this:
If ##F:\mathbb R^n\to\mathbb R## is ##C^\infty##, then for each ##a=(a^1,\dots,a^n)\in\mathbb R^n## there exist ##C^\infty## functions ##H_\mu## such that for all ##x\in\mathbb R^n## we have
$$F(x)=F(a)+\sum_{\mu=1}^n(x^\mu-a^\mu)H_\mu(x).$$ Furthermore, we have
$$H_\mu(a)=\frac{\partial F}{\partial x^\mu}\bigg|_{x=a}.$$​
A similar theorem is stated and proved in Isham's book on differential geometry, page 82. So nulliusinverb, I suggest you take a look at that.
 
Fredrick thank you very much, the book is recommended to study this issue, although the theorem is raised from other values ​​is the same. thank!

ps: "Modern Differential Geometry for Physicists" autor: Isham
 
Notation is a major problem here. xi usually means the ith power of x. For this theorem it means the ith component of a vector x ε Rn.

I suggest that, when anyone asks a question, make sure the notation is clear!
 
i apologize for the delay, here is the proof:

F:ℝ^{n}\rightarrowℝ

i have:

F(\vec{x})-F(\vec{a})= \sum^{m}_{μ=1}F(t(x^{μ}-a^{μ})+a^{μ},0...,0)^{t=1}_{t=0}
then:
=\sum^{m}_{μ=1}(x^{μ}-a^{μ})\int^{1}_{0}\frac{\partial F}{\partial u^{μ}}((t(x^{μ}-a^{μ})+a^{μ},0...,0)dt
where:

H_{μ}(\vec{x})=\int^{1}_{0}\frac{\partial F(\vec{x})}{\partial u^{μ}}dt

finally:

F(\vec{x})-F(\vec{a})= \sum^{m}_{μ=1}H_{μ}(\vec{x})(x^{μ}-a^{μ})

qed

thanks you very much to all!
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top