Programs Theoretical or just physics degree? Maths is sort of good, is that enough?

AI Thread Summary
Considering a shift to a Theoretical Physics course raises concerns about the heavy mathematical requirements. The appeal of theoretical physics lies in its scientific and philosophical aspects, but there is uncertainty about math proficiency, particularly with middling A grades in Pure Maths and C grades in Further Maths. The discussion emphasizes the importance of improving mechanics and pure math skills, as these are crucial for success in theoretical physics. Many universities allow switching between courses in the first year, which provides some reassurance. The advice leans towards retaking mechanics to strengthen the foundation for pursuing theoretical physics.
B.A. Maracas
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey, as you may have guessed I'm thinking of taking a Theoretical Physics course rather than just straight Physics, but that due to its maths-heavy nature I'm worried I might not cope all that well.
I mean, I love the idea of theoretical - admittedly it's a rather romanticised view of it - but it appeals both scientifically and philosophically, it seems wonderfully interesting and all that kind of thing (and it sounds cool when you tell people :-p). I could go on about why it sounds so great, but to be perfectly honest I can't be bothered at the moment.
However, I'm worried that my maths might not be up to it. In terms of A-Levels I'm getting middling A grades in Pure Maths but C grades in Further Maths (mechanics, statisitics, all that business)
I would be perfectly happy with straight physics, but ideally it'd have to be theoretical. I just don't know if I'm being unrealistic in going for it.

I know most universities say you can easily switch between courses in the first year, sometimes the second, but I'd like to get myself a clear idea of what, realistically, I want to be doing.

Thanks for any advice, this is probably a pretty common question, so sorry about that.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Go for it, and pure maths is more important than stats and decision. Mechanics is quite important though, get that up. Just work harder and try and get your mechanics and pure modules as high as possible.
 
Thanks, I was kind of hoping someone would say something along those lines :P
And yeah, like you say, I'll go for retaking a bit of the old mechanics and that.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Back
Top