Programs Theoretical or just physics degree? Maths is sort of good, is that enough?

AI Thread Summary
Considering a shift to a Theoretical Physics course raises concerns about the heavy mathematical requirements. The appeal of theoretical physics lies in its scientific and philosophical aspects, but there is uncertainty about math proficiency, particularly with middling A grades in Pure Maths and C grades in Further Maths. The discussion emphasizes the importance of improving mechanics and pure math skills, as these are crucial for success in theoretical physics. Many universities allow switching between courses in the first year, which provides some reassurance. The advice leans towards retaking mechanics to strengthen the foundation for pursuing theoretical physics.
B.A. Maracas
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey, as you may have guessed I'm thinking of taking a Theoretical Physics course rather than just straight Physics, but that due to its maths-heavy nature I'm worried I might not cope all that well.
I mean, I love the idea of theoretical - admittedly it's a rather romanticised view of it - but it appeals both scientifically and philosophically, it seems wonderfully interesting and all that kind of thing (and it sounds cool when you tell people :-p). I could go on about why it sounds so great, but to be perfectly honest I can't be bothered at the moment.
However, I'm worried that my maths might not be up to it. In terms of A-Levels I'm getting middling A grades in Pure Maths but C grades in Further Maths (mechanics, statisitics, all that business)
I would be perfectly happy with straight physics, but ideally it'd have to be theoretical. I just don't know if I'm being unrealistic in going for it.

I know most universities say you can easily switch between courses in the first year, sometimes the second, but I'd like to get myself a clear idea of what, realistically, I want to be doing.

Thanks for any advice, this is probably a pretty common question, so sorry about that.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Go for it, and pure maths is more important than stats and decision. Mechanics is quite important though, get that up. Just work harder and try and get your mechanics and pure modules as high as possible.
 
Thanks, I was kind of hoping someone would say something along those lines :P
And yeah, like you say, I'll go for retaking a bit of the old mechanics and that.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?
Back
Top