I Are the Laws of Thermodynamics still applicable in modern physics?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the relevance and classification of scientific laws, particularly the Laws of Thermodynamics, in modern physics. Participants note that while terms like "Law" and "Theory" have evolved, the Laws of Thermodynamics remain significant and largely undisputed despite their age. The conversation highlights that scientific understanding is dynamic, with historical laws often being expanded or refined as new evidence emerges. Additionally, there is mention of recent experiments that challenge the Second Law of Thermodynamics on short time scales, suggesting ongoing exploration in the field. Ultimately, the discourse reflects a recognition of the complexity and fluidity of scientific knowledge.
saddlestone-man
Messages
80
Reaction score
20
TL;DR Summary
Who determines what's a Theory and what's a Law?
Hello All

We have Newton's Laws of Motion, which have been superseded by Einstein's Theory of General Relativity.

Who determines what's a Theory and what's a Law?

best regards ... Stef
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Those are just names, some of which evolved historically. I wouldn't worry about it. "Law" is out of favor these days. Too categorical.
 
  • Like
Likes hutchphd, sophiecentaur, Vanadium 50 and 2 others
phinds said:
Those are just names, some of which evolved historically. I wouldn't worry about it. "Law" is out of favor these days. Too categorical.
In the old days, Scientists believed that they were uncovering 'Laws' which had been laid down in the Universe by a deity. Most of us realize that this was probably misguided. Modern day Scientists are only too well aware of the rate of change of our knowledge and that it would be almost presumptuous to expect to find a 'Law'. In a year / decade / century, your law would have add-ons to account for new evidence.
 
Are there any historical "Laws" in physics which are still undisputed?

I would nominate the Laws of Thermodynamics, now more than 100 years old. I believe what eventually became the Second Law was formulated in 1824, ie almost 200 years ago,
 
saddlestone-man said:
Are there any historical "Laws" in physics which are still undisputed?
Disputed is the wrong word. It implies that there is no need to dig deeper. For example, General Relativity showed us that Newton's Law of gravity is not the whole story on very large scales.

It may surprise you, but there are some things in physics that are even more fun to think about than laws. The principle of causality is one. The principle of least action is another. But the easiest one to understand is the cosmological principle. I suggest that you read some about all three of those, they may arouse your interest. Then ask yourself, "Why are these principles rather than laws?"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causality
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_least_action
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_principle
 
saddlestone-man said:
Are there any historical "Laws" in physics which are still undisputed?

I would nominate the Laws of Thermodynamics, now more than 100 years old. I believe what eventually became the Second Law was formulated in 1824, ie almost 200 years ago,
You may want to read about recent work on the fluctuation theorem. There are experiments which show violations of the 2nd law on short time scales.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top