Theories of relativity and the resulting E = MC^2

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter LitleBang
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relativity Theories
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on Einstein's theories of relativity, particularly the implications of E = MC^2 and the nature of time. Participants explore the concept of time as variable and its relationship to the Big Bang and the expansion of the universe. The scope includes theoretical interpretations and conceptual clarifications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Debate/contested, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that Einstein's insight regarding the variability of time is more significant than E = MC^2.
  • One participant questions the notion that the universe must have an edge if it had a Big Bang, suggesting that the topology of spacetime does not imply boundedness.
  • Another participant challenges the idea that time at the edge of the universe is faster now than at the Big Bang, stating that this is not necessarily true.
  • There is a suggestion that understanding conventional theories is important before forming personal theories about these concepts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of the Big Bang and the nature of time, indicating that multiple competing views remain and the discussion is unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about the nature of the universe's edge and the interpretation of time, which remain open to debate and are not universally accepted.

LitleBang
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
Einstein"s theories of relativity and the resulting E = MC^2, although extremely important to physics, was not his greatest insight. His idea that time is not fixed, that it can run infinitely slow or possibly infinitely fast was the most important.

If there was a Big Bang, that suggests at one second after the BB then the universe had an edge. If that is true then the universe should have an edge now. The universe is expanding at an accelerated rate. Doesn't that imply that time at the edge now is much faster than at the BB?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


No, the topology of spacetime described by the big bang does not imply a bounded universe, even if the universe is finite. Consider a 2-sphere, it has a finite surface area, but no edges.
 


LitleBang said:
His idea that time is not fixed, that it can run infinitely slow or possibly infinitely fast was the most important.

I don't think he would agree with that.

LitleBang said:
If there was a Big Bang, that suggests at one second after the BB then the universe had an edge.

Not necessarily.


LitleBang said:
If that is true then the universe should have an edge now.

Again, not necessarily.

LitleBang said:
The universe is expanding at an accelerated rate. Doesn't that imply that time at the edge now is much faster than at the BB?

Not really.

I would suggest that it's probably better to learn what conventional theory says before theorizing yourself.
 


Also:
LitleBang said:
Einstein"s theories of relativity and the resulting E = MC^2, although extremely important to physics, was not his greatest insight. His idea that time is not fixed, that it can run infinitely slow or possibly infinitely fast was the most important.
The second is a component of the first!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K