Theory of quadratic equations

Vishalrox
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
theory of quadratic equations...

theres a quadratic equation lx^2 + nx + n where its roots are in the ratio p:q .we need to prove that
√(p/q) + √(q/p) + √(n/l) = 0

what i did was..i introduced a proportionality constant k... so pk + qk = -(n/l)
while pq(k^2) = n/l ...solved these two equations and got the value of k as -(p+q)/pq...
and i substituted..i got the roots of the equation in terms of p and q...i got the value of n/l = ((p+q)^2)/pq...coming to the equation which we need to prove...i squared the whole Left Hand Side...expanded it...and substituting whatever i got...i got..4((p+q)^2)/pq...i.e.,i got 4(n/l)...so now we got to prove that 4(n\l) is 0...but if 4(n\l) = 0 then n/l will be 0...which in turn accounts for n = 0...which lands us into a trivial case...all roots and all other coefficients other than leading coefficient (l) to be 0...but i don't think that would be the right way to solve this problem...can anyone help me on this on a different method...?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


Did you ever try actually solving the equation for its roots p and q?
 


There is something wrong in what you are trying to prove. It should be -\sqrt{n/l}, because if all positive, it means all the square root terms should be individually zero, which isn't possible.

Simply reduce the expression you are trying to prove,

\sqrt{\frac{p}{q}} + \sqrt{\frac{q}{p}} - \sqrt{\frac{n}{l}}

Is equal to,

\frac{p+q}{\sqrt{pq}} - \sqrt{\frac{n}{l}}

Use n/l from the Vieta formula and that should give you your result.
 


The question was from Hall & Knight...i know the problem is wrong...so we have to prove the trivial case...so i did it...everything i did...i did using Vieta's theorem...
 


Millennial said:
Did you ever try actually solving the equation for its roots p and q?

I found the values of p and q...as i found the value k...and by the way p and q are not the roots...only pk and qk are the roots which i found...
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top