What is the theory behind Scanning Tunneling Microscopy (STM) technique?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ovidiut
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stm Theory
ovidiut
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
hi to everyone!
who can help me with a almost and understandable complete theory of Scanning tunneling Microscopy technique?
with my best wishes
O.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are entire books written on the theory of STM.

From: http://www.chemistry.adelaide.edu.au/external/soc-rel/content/stm.htm
Scanning-tunneling microscopy (STM) can image surfaces of conducting materials with atomic-scale resolution. It uses an atomically-sharp metal tip that is brought very close to the surface. When the tip and sample are connected with a voltage source, a small tunneling current flows between the tip and sample surface. This current can be measured, and the magnitude depends on the distance between the tip and the surface. As the tip is moved laterally across the surface, a feedback mechanism moves the tip up and down to maintain a constant tunneling current. Rastering the tip across the surface therefore produces a topographic map of the surface.

More detailed explanation :
http://www.llnl.gov/str/Scan.html

Tutorials and problems :
http://www.chembio.uoguelph.ca/educmat/chm729/STMpage/stmtutor.htm

IBM Almaden Labs uses the STM as a materials synthesis tool (to perform atomic re-arrangements) - their image gallery is really neat :
http://www.almaden.ibm.com/vis/stm/stm.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top