There's a man hanging on a Tyrolean traverse , we must not let this man die

  • Thread starter Thread starter hjr
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the necessary sag distance (x) for a Tyrolean traverse rope to ensure it remains within a safe tension limit of 2.8 kN, given a span of 23 m and a load of 73 kg. The user is confused about how to relate the tension forces and the sagging angle, as well as how to incorporate the rope length into their calculations. They attempted to analyze the forces acting on the system but struggled with the absence of angle measurements and the connection between force and distance. The key concept suggested is to use trigonometric relationships in the context of the rope's geometry to find the angle and subsequently the sag distance. Understanding these relationships is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
hjr
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
first time posting

Homework Statement


Christian is making a Tyrolean traverse as shown in the figure. That is, he traverses a chasm by stringing a rope between a tree on one side of the chasm and a tree on the opposite side, 23 m away. The rope must sag sufficiently so it won't break. Assume the rope can provide a tension force of up to 28 kN before breaking, and use a "safety factor" of 10 (that is, the rope should only be required to undergo a tension force of 2.8 kN) at the center of the Tyrolean traverse. Determine the distance x that the rope must sag if it is to be within its recommended safety range and Christian's mass is 73.0 kg.

Homework Equations


F=ma


The Attempt at a Solution



So basically the x component is throwing me off. The tension in the rope shouldn't be greater then 2.8kN. I tried to add the two vectors of the tension force so I had one vector pointing straight up and the force of mg pointing down. I believe the acceleration should be zero since you don't want the guy moving. So the force pushing down shouldn't be greater then the upward force. But then isn't the downward force always the same? I thought maybe it had to do something with velocity but the acceleration is constant. Then tried making two triangles with the x component being the base for each. But they give no angles, so I gave up on that idea. Then I tried to relate the length of the rope(they give it for a reason) to the max force allowed but I can't see the connection. I can't jump from the force to the distance. If someone could point me in the right direction I would greatly appreciate it. You can send me a link to a concept I'm missing here, anything that helps.
 

Attachments

  • GIANCOLI.ch04.p31.jpg
    GIANCOLI.ch04.p31.jpg
    7.1 KB · Views: 590
Physics news on Phys.org
Once you find the angle, you should be able to find rope length solving the triangle - that's the idea behind the question.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .

Similar threads

Back
Top