Thermal Physics: 2 Cases, Ratio V(1)/V(2) for Small T

Fys
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I had a question about 2 cases

we have a cilinder with 2 Ideal Gases. The volume, mass and the number of particles
is given. So We call it V(1),M(1),N(1) for the first gas and V(2),M(2),N(2) for
the second gas. The two gases are separated by a movable wall

Now what is the Ratio V(1)/V(2) for very small T (almost zero) if

1. both gases consist of fermions
2.the first gas consist of bosons and the other one form fermions


I thought for the both cases I use PV=NKT. And so express V in the other quantities.
Then use the fermi distribution and the bose-distribution. But using this I get all kinds of quantities which I don't have.
Can someone help me with this?

thanks for the help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You cannot use PV = NkT for an ideal quantum gas at low temperatures.

In case of the Fermi gas, you know that in the linit of zero temperature, the pressure becomes a nonzero constant. It is given by minus the derivative of the total ground state energy w.r.t. volume.

If you don't exactly remember how this is computed, you should first study this before attempting to solve this problem.

In case of the Bose gas, you know that a macroscopic fraction of the molecules will be in the ground state below the critical temperature for Bose-Einstein condensation. There is a maximum density for the particles that are not in the condensate.

You should first derive an expression for the pressure for the Bose gas from first principles before proceeding with this case.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top