Thermal Switch Design Project fast

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the design of a thermal switch involving vertical metal strips of steel and aluminum, focusing on modifying the dimensions of the aluminum strip to achieve a specific activation temperature change. The scope includes mathematical reasoning and technical explanations related to thermal expansion and structural mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • The original design activates at a 180 degF temperature increase, and the goal is to modify it for a 100 degF increase by changing the aluminum strip's dimensions.
  • The participant presents equations for deformation and critical axial compressive load, attempting to equate the deformations of aluminum and steel.
  • There is a calculation for the temperature change, ΔT, derived from the deformation equations, which results in a negative value when substituting the original dimensions.
  • One participant points out a potential error in the critical load equation, suggesting that the negative sign was omitted in the participant's formulation.
  • Another participant clarifies that the negative sign in the critical load equation indicates a compressive force, while the professor's handout lists it as a magnitude without the negative sign.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the correct formulation of the critical load equation, with some agreeing on the need for a negative sign while others reference the professor's handout that does not include it. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these differing formulations.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions about the definitions and signs used in the equations, particularly concerning the critical load and its representation in the context of compressive forces.

naevitar77
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



There are three vertical metal strips (Steel, Aluminum, Steel) between two horizontal rigid bodies

alphaa = 12.5 E-6 /degF -- coefficient of thermal expansion
alphas = 6.6 E-6 /degF
Ea = 10 E6 psi -- Young's Modulus
Es = 30 E6 psi

The original dimensions of the switch are
ta = .0625 in -- thickness of aluminum
wa = .25 in -- width of aluminum
ts = .0625 in
ws = .125 in
L = 4 in -- length of all metals

With these dimensions, the switch will activate with a 180 degF temperature increase

By only changing the dimensions of the aluminum strip, I have to modify the switch to activate with 100 degF temperature increase

Homework Equations



δ = P*L/(E*A) + alpha*ΔT*L

Pcr = 4*pi^2*Ea*Ia / L^2 -- critical axial compressive load for the aluminum to buckle
Ia = wa*ta^3/12 -- minimum second moment of inertia

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried setting the deformation of the aluminum equal to that of the steel

δa = δs
Pa*L/(Ea*Aa) + alphaa*ΔT*L = Ps*L/(Es*As) + alphas*ΔT*L

from a free body diagram, I got Ps = -.5*Pa

Pa*L/(Ea*Aa) + alphaa*ΔT*L = -Pa*L/(2*Es*As) + alphas*ΔT*L
Pa*(1/(Ea*Aa) + 1/(2*Es*As)) = ΔT*(alphas - alphaa)

solving for Pa and simplifying using (1/a + 1/b)^-1 = ab/(a+b)

Pa = ΔT*(alphas - alphaa)*(2*Ea*Aa*Es*As / (Ea*Aa + 2*Es*As))

substituting Pcr = Pa

pi^2*Ea*wa*ta^3/(3*L^2) = ΔT*(alphas - alphaa)*(2*Ea*Aa*Es*As / (Ea*Aa + 2*Es*As))

now solving this for the temperature..

ΔT = pi^2*ta^2/(3*L^2) * (Ea*Aa + 2*Es*As)/(2*Es*As(alphas - alphaa))

when I plug in the variables for the 180 degF switch from above, I am getting
ΔT = -181.5 degF and I do not see anything wrong in my algebra; my units still come out to be degF.

Can someone tell me what I am doing wrong? Am I approaching this the right way?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
naevitar77: Excellent work, so far, except for one minor mistake. Pcr should be, Pcr = -4*Ea*Ia*(pi/L)^2. You erroneously omitted the negative sign here. Try it again.

By the way, numbers less than 1 should always have a zero before the decimal point. E.g., 0.25, not .25. See the international standard for writing units[/color] (ISO 31-0[/color]).
 
nvn said:
naevitar77: Excellent work, so far, except for one minor mistake. Pcr should be, Pcr = -4*Ea*Ia*(pi/L)^2. You erroneously omitted the negative sign here. Try it again.

The handout my professor passed out on this project defines Pcr without a negative sign. Why is it suppose to be negative?
 
Pcr is negative because it is compressive force. Your professor listed the magnitude.
 
That makes sense. Thank you so much nvn. You're a life saver!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
13K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
11K