Thermionic emission at same temperature

goran d
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
As it is known, the thermionic emission (emission of electrons at high temperature) current density in vacuum depends on the temperature and the work function of the material. The work function is a material specific constant. Let's compare thermionic emission with thermal radiation. With thermal radiation, the amount of emitted photons per unit area for a black body depends only on the temperature. (It is proportional to T4). The black body absorbs all photons that fall on it. For non-black body, the emitted radiation is the black body radiation multiplied by a coefficient less than 1. The absorption is also proportional to the same coefficient. Because of this, at equal temperature, there is a balance between the emitted and absorbed radiation between objects. However, thermionic emission is very different. Here, the emission per unit area under equal temperature is larger for materials with lesser work function. However, the absorption doesn't depend on the work function - an object will absorb all electrons that hit it. So there is no balance between two objects with different work functions at the same temperature. If we place 2 such objects next to one another, more electrons will flow from the object with the smaller work function towards the one with larger work function than the other way round, since the object with smaller work function emits more. Therefore, a potential difference will be created between the 2 objects. If they are connected to an external circuit, a current will flow. This would be a thermionic generator with no need for cooling!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So, in conclusion, thermionic emission is very different from thermal radiation in the sense that it does not reach a balance between objects with different work functions at the same temperature. This can be used to create a thermionic generator with no need for cooling!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top