Thermionic Emission Effects on Surfaces

AI Thread Summary
Continuous emission of electrons from a surface leads to a deficiency of electrons, resulting in a positive charge on that surface. As more electrons are removed, the increased positive potential requires higher energy to free additional electrons, eventually halting emission. The discussion highlights that while billions of electrons may be emitted, the resulting charge imbalance affects the surface's properties. An example is provided where a gold leaf electrode exposed to ultraviolet radiation spreads out, demonstrating the effects of electron emission. This illustrates the significant impact of thermionic emission on surface charge dynamics.
123kid
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
If there is continue emission of electrons from surface then what will
be its effect on that surface? Some of my friends told me that there are
billions billions electrons. Nothing happen. But i think there is also emission of billions of electrons within small time. Can this process make a deficiency of electrons on the surface ? Can it completely remove all the electrons?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No. As you remove more electrons, you are leaving behind more positive charge, which will prevent further electron removal. You will need more and more energy to remove more electrons.
 
123kid said:
If there is continue emission of electrons from surface then what will
be its effect on that surface? Some of my friends told me that there are
billions billions electrons. Nothing happen. But i think there is also emission of billions of electrons within small time. Can this process make a deficiency of electrons on the surface ? Can it completely remove all the electrons?
the object will have less electrons hence becomes positively charged. the increased potensial will cause higher limit of foton energy to free more electron until it stops the electron emission.
you can find a video in youtube where a gold leaf electrode is exposed to ultraviolet radiation then the leaf spreads out. when the radiation is visible light the leaf doesn't move.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...

Similar threads

Back
Top