Thermodynamics: Entropy of 2 large Einstein Solids

Bosley
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider a system of 2 large, identical Einstein solids. Each solid has N=10^23 oscillators, and the total energy units in the combined system is 2N.

a) Assuming that all of the microstates are allowed, compute the entropy of this system. This is the entropy over long time scales.
b) Compute entropy again assuming the system is in its most likely macrostate. This is the entropy over short time scales.
c) Is the issue of time scales really relevant here?
d) Suppose that at a moment when the system is near its most likely macrostate, you insert a partition between the solids so they can't exchange energy anymore. Now, even over long time scales, the entropy is the answer from part a. So the second law of thermodynamics has, in a sense, been violated. Is this significant? Should we lose sleep over it?

Homework Equations


We are given that the multiplicity of the combined system (that is, all possible microstates) is \frac{2^{4N}}{\sqrt{8 \pi N}}.

We're given that the multiplicity of the most likely macrostate (where Energy A = Energy B = N units) is \frac{2^{4N}}{4 \pi N}.

The Attempt at a Solution


a) S = k*log(W)
S = k*log(2^{4*10^{23}}/\sqrt{8*\pi*10^{23}})
Problem: This is incalculably large. Is there some different way that I should be approximating a value for this? Mathematica overflows. Wolfram gives back a nonsensical "power of 10 representation" that is incorrect. What to do?

b) Likewise, S = k*log(2^{4*10^{23}}/(4*\pi*10^{23}) is incalculably large. Does the problem just want me to say "Both are basically infinite"? This is confusing, though, because I thought we were supposed to usually get tractable values for entropy.

c) Since both numbers for a and b are apparently intractably large (unless I'm doing something terribly wrong), it seems that the time scale doesn't matter?

d) I don't know.

Advice please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Where did you get your multiplicity of the combined system equation?
 
Nevermind. I feel dumb now.
 
Try using log rules. So, for example,

S = k*ln(2^{4*10^{23}}/\sqrt{8*\pi*10^{23}}) becomes
S=k*[(4*10^{23})*ln(2)-(1/2)ln(8*\pi*10^{23})]

And
S = k*log(2^{4*10^{23}}/(4*\pi*10^{23})
Becomes
k*[(4*10^{23})*ln(2)-ln(4*\pi*10^{23})]

Can you evaluate this now?
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top