Thermodynamics - hot item placed in water

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a thermodynamics problem involving a 900 g aluminum pan and 12.0 L of water, where the water's temperature rises from 19.0°C to 24.5°C after the pan is submerged. The key equation used is the heat balance equation, Q_net = 0, which equates the heat lost by the pan to the heat gained by the water. Participants clarify that the temperature change for both substances should be expressed as the difference between final and initial temperatures, leading to a single unknown for the initial temperature of the pan. After correcting the calculations, the initial temperature of the pan is determined to be approximately 365.4°C, which converts to about 689.8°F. The problem emphasizes the importance of understanding thermal equilibrium and proper unit conversions in thermodynamic calculations.
portofino
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 900 g aluminum pan is removed from the stove and plunged into a sink filled with 12.0 L of water at 19.0 degrees. The water temperature quickly rises to 24.5 degrees.

What was the initial temperature of the pan in degrees C?

What was the initial temperature of the pan in degrees F?

Homework Equations



Q_net = 0 where Q is heat

No phase changes involved so no latent heats required

C1 = specific heat capacity, aluminum: 900 J/kg-K
C2 = Specific heat capacity, water: 4.184 kJ/kg-K = 4184 J

Q_net = (C1)(M1)(T) + (C2)(M2)(T2) = 0

where C1 = 900, C2 = 4184, M1 = 900g = 0.9 kg, M2 = 12kg because 1 L water = 1 kg, T = unknown, T2 = 24 - 19 = 5 degrees

Tc = T - 273.15 where Tc is temp in celsius, T is temp in kelvin
Tf = 9/5(Tc) + 32 where Tf is temp in fahrenheit, Tc is temp in celsius

The Attempt at a Solution



Q_net = (C1)(M1)(T) + (C2)(M2)(T2) = 0

no phase changes involved, no latent heats needed

= (900)(0.9)(T) + (4184)(12)(24-19)
= (900)(0.9)(T) + (4184)(12)(5)
T = -[(4184)(12)(5)] / [(900)(0.9)] = -309 degrees

I assumed that -309 was in kelvin, thus used the above equation to solve for temperature in celsius.

i noticed that the temp was negative, thus decided that since the water temp increased, the temperature had to be positive, thus -309 became 309, and using the kelvin-->celsius conversion i got 36 degrees Celsius which was incorrect?

as for the second part, the initial temp in fahrenheit, i need to solve the first part to get it.

what did i do wrong? it seems like a straightforward problem, i think i missed something.

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi portofino,

I think you are misinterpreting what T is. Looking at these steps:

portofino said:

The Attempt at a Solution



Q_net = (C1)(M1)(T) + (C2)(M2)(T2) = 0

no phase changes involved, no latent heats needed

= (900)(0.9)(T) + (4184)(12)(24-19)
= (900)(0.9)(T) + (4184)(12)(5)

If you look at the water term, 5 is not the temperature in Kelvin of the water, it is the change in the water's temperature. The T in this equation plays the same role for the aluminum.
 
so should T actually be (Tf - Ti) where Tf is final temp and Ti is the initial temp? or should T just become deltaT = change in temp?

should i even have two unknowns for temperature?

actually it should have been 24.5 - 19 = 5.5, not 5. how do i use the temperature change (5.5)? am i supposed to find a temperature equivalent for 24.5 and 19? if so i don't know what scale the temperatures are in.
 
I don't think this is a very well worded problem. You need to make the assumption that both the water and the pan have reached thermal equilibrium. If that is the case then the pan would have the same final temperature as the water. Meaning that you only have one unknown (temp of pan).
 
i see what you're saying topher, so T should then be (24.5 - Ti)?
 
Yep.
 
is that the same case for the water, so instead of 5.5 it should also be T = (24.5 - Ti), what happens to the 19 degrees stated in the problem?
 
portofino said:
is that the same case for the water, so instead of 5.5 it should also be T = (24.5 - Ti), what happens to the 19 degrees stated in the problem?

That shouldn't make a difference. 24.5 - Ti = 5.5.
 
portofino said:
is that the same case for the water, so instead of 5.5 it should also be T = (24.5 - Ti), what happens to the 19 degrees stated in the problem?

Perhaps it would be clearer to re-write your energy balance:

m_{water} \cdot C_{water} \cdot (T_f - T_i)_{water} + m_{AL} \cdot C_{AL} \cdot (T_f - T_i)_{AL} = 0

Since they are in equilibrium, T_{f,water} = T_{f,AL} = T_f

Plug that back into the equation above and the only unknown is T_{i,AL}, so it would then be a matter of rearranging the equation and plugging in the given/known values.

The initial and final temperatures were given in the problem in Celsius. Convert those to Kelvin before solving the equation (i.e. just add 273 to the given values). Also for future reference you may want to remember that Kelvin is an absolute scale. Hence, there can be no negative values in Kelvin.

Hope this helps.

CS
 
  • #10
using the above equation i got this:

Tf_w = Tf_al = 24.5 = 24.5 + 273 = 297.5 kelvin
Ti_w = 19 = 19 + 273 = 292 kelvin

find Ti_al

[(12)(4184)(297.5-292)]_water + [(0.9)(900)(297.5 -Ti)]_aluminum = 0
271644 + 240975 - 810Ti = 0
810Ti = 517119
Ti = 638.41 kelvin, so for part one Ti in celsius = 638.41 - 273 = 365.418 celsius

and for part b using equation:

Tf = 9/5(Tc) + 32 where Tf is temp in fahrenheit, Tc is temp in celsius

temp in fahrenheit = 9/5(365.418) + 32 = 689.753 deg fahrenheit

is that correct now?
 
  • #11
sorry to double post, just wanted to let you all know that the above values i got were in fact correct.

thanks for the help
 
Back
Top