Thermodynamics of Hell Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter thechunk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thermodynamics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the mathematical analysis of whether hell is endothermic or exothermic using ideal gas laws. Two key statements are presented: if hell expands slower than the influx of souls, temperature and pressure will rise, while if it expands faster, they will drop. The user attempts to derive equations based on the ideal gas law but realizes the complexity of the variables involved. Suggestions include focusing on solving ordinary differential equations (ODEs) for pressure and temperature separately and considering simpler cases where the rates of change are constant. The conversation emphasizes the need to isolate variables effectively to draw meaningful conclusions about the behavior of hell's conditions.
thechunk
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hey all. I was reading that story about the physics student who is asked to show whether hell is endothermic or exothermic (here's the http://www.people.virginia.edu/~rjh9u/hellthrm.html to the story) when I came upon the following statements:

1. If hell is expanding at a slower rate than the rate at which souls enter hell, then the temperature and pressure in hell will increase until all hell breaks loose.

2. If hell is expanding at a rate faster than the increase of souls in hell, than the temperature and pressure will drop until hell freezes over.

From what I learned in my high school physics class, these are valid statements, however how can one prove the above statements mathematically using the ideal gas laws.

What I have done as of right now, was taking the derivative with respect to time of PV=nRT(nothing is constant except R) to get

<br /> \frac{dP}{dt} V + \frac{dV}{dt} P = \frac{dn}{dt} T R + \frac{dT}{dt} n R<br />

Then I said the system is at STP for convenience with one mol of gas (or souls whatever you want to call them) and got the following

<br /> \frac{dV}{dt} - 22.4 \frac{dn}{dt} = .0821 \frac{dT}{dt} - 22.4 \frac{dP}{dt} <br />

Now assuming that the change in volume as well as the change in number of moles is positive, what conclusions can I make from the above statement. Maybe I took this in the wrong direction or very probably overcomplicated the situation but any help would be much appreciated.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Science news on Phys.org
V, P and T are not constant so you can't assume STP for simplicity.

The first statement about hell is one about pressure. That means that you have to solve your ODE for pressure and take the limit of time to infinity. It should go to infinity.

The second statement is about temperature. So solve the ODE for T and take the same limit. It should go to zero.

You could study the simple case where \frac{dV}{dt} and \frac{dn}{dt} are constants. That way it is easier to solve the ODE and possible to take the limit.

EDIT:
You should also need to remove T and P from the first and second equation, respectfully, via the original law PV=nRT. So you need only solve for either P or T.
 
Last edited:
Ah, I kind of see, thanks for the help
 
I was watching a Khan Academy video on entropy called: Reconciling thermodynamic and state definitions of entropy. So in the video it says: Let's say I have a container. And in that container, I have gas particles and they're bouncing around like gas particles tend to do, creating some pressure on the container of a certain volume. And let's say I have n particles. Now, each of these particles could be in x different states. Now, if each of them can be in x different states, how many total...
Thread 'Why work is PdV and not (P+dP)dV in an isothermal process?'
Let's say we have a cylinder of volume V1 with a frictionless movable piston and some gas trapped inside with pressure P1 and temperature T1. On top of the piston lay some small pebbles that add weight and essentially create the pressure P1. Also the system is inside a reservoir of water that keeps its temperature constant at T1. The system is in equilibrium at V1, P1, T1. Now let's say i put another very small pebble on top of the piston (0,00001kg) and after some seconds the system...
Back
Top