Thin film intereference basic question

  • Thread starter Thread starter perilawaits
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Film Thin film
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the complexities of determining the thickness in thin film interference problems. There is no single formula for thickness, as it varies based on whether the interference is constructive or destructive and the indices of refraction of the materials involved. The same formula can yield different results depending on the context of the film and surrounding media. Users are advised to analyze each specific case rather than relying on a universal equation. Understanding the principles of interference and material properties is essential for accurate calculations.
perilawaits
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
This is not a homework problem but a general problem I've been having when studying for physics.

What is the formula for "thickness" for thin film interference problems?

I read somewhere that there are a variety of equations that can be used--depending on interferences, and etc--however, I just need a solid list of formulas.

I've looked through my book and the Internet, and I'm finding a variety of formulas, but none of these sources tell me when to apply each specific thickness formula.

Can anyone provide a list of formulas and when to use them?

I would greatly appreciate any assistance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry, there is no such formula. The reason is that the same formula that gives the thickness for constructive interference for one film will give the thickness for destructive interference for another film. It all depends on the relative indices of refraction between the thin film and the two media on either side of it. You need to consider each case on its merits.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top