How can we prove the covariant derivation of the Riemann-Christoffel tensor?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jinroh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Identity
Jinroh
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Given the definition of the covariant derivation of one order tensor :

\nabla _j v_k = \partial _j v_k - v_i \Gamma _{kj}^i

How can we proove the covariant derivation of the Riemann-Christoffel tensor given by :


R_{i{\text{ }},{\text{ }}jk}^l = \partial _j \Gamma _{ik}^l - \partial _k \Gamma _{ij}^l + \Gamma _{ik}^r \Gamma _{jr}^l - \Gamma _{ij}^r \Gamma _{kr}^l

is :

\nabla _t R_{i,rs}^l = \partial _{rt} \Gamma _{si}^l - \partial _{st} \Gamma _{ri}^l

This could not be difficult but I'm afraid to make an error with the indices.

This proof will help me to define the Einstein tensor.

Thanks for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hum...

perhaps by moving this post in Special and General Relativity Room I will have an answer... ?
 
Jinroh said:
perhaps by moving this post in Special and General Relativity Room I will have an answer... ?

Maybe. I was looking at your problem last night, and I think I should be able to have something for you by this evening or tomorrow morning (party tonight, so no guarantees for today...)

However, while we're on the topic of soliciting responses, do you have any ideas about my question of a geometric interpretation of the Laplacian on a manifold? How's that for a shameless plug!
 
Hello! There is a simple line in the textbook. If ##S## is a manifold, an injectively immersed submanifold ##M## of ##S## is embedded if and only if ##M## is locally closed in ##S##. Recall the definition. M is locally closed if for each point ##x\in M## there open ##U\subset S## such that ##M\cap U## is closed in ##U##. Embedding to injective immesion is simple. The opposite direction is hard. Suppose I have ##N## as source manifold and ##f:N\rightarrow S## is the injective...
Back
Top