MHB This gives us the length of each train as 500 meters.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ilikebugs
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Length Trains
Ilikebugs
Messages
94
Reaction score
0
Two trains of equal length are on parallel tracks. One train is traveling at
40 km/h and the other at 20 km/h. It takes two minutes longer for the trains to
completely pass one another when going in the same direction, than when going
in opposite directions.
Determine the length of each train.

Is there a way to algebraically solve this
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would convert the speeds to m/min...

$$v\,\frac{\text{km}}{\text{hr}}\cdot\frac{1\text{ hr}}{60\text{ min}}\cdot\frac{1000\text{ m}}{1\text{ km}}=\frac{50}{3}v\,\frac{\text{m}}{\text{min}}$$

And so the speed of the faster train (in m/min) is:

$$v_F=\frac{2000}{3}$$

And the speed of the slower train is:

$$v_S=\frac{1000}{3}$$

In fact, we could write:

$$v_F=2v_S$$

Let's let the length of the trains be $\ell$.

Now, when the trains pass going in the same direction, we have:

$$(v_F-v_S)(t+2)=2\ell$$

or:

$$v_S(t+2)=2\ell$$

And when the trains pass going in the opposite direction, we have:

$$(v_F+v_S)t=2\ell$$

or:

$$3v_St=2\ell$$

Can you proceed?
 
t=1 so l=500m?
 
Last edited:
We have

$$3v_St=2L\quad(1)$$

and

$$v_S(t+2)=2L\quad(2)$$

Multiply $(2)$ by 3 and then subtract $(1)$ from the result:

$$3v_S(t+2)=6L\Rightarrow3v_St+6v_S=6L$$

$$6v_S=4L\Rightarrow v_S=\frac{2L}{3}\Rightarrow\frac{1000}{3}=\frac{2L}{3}\implies L=500\text{ m.}$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top