MHB This gives us the length of each train as 500 meters.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ilikebugs
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Length Trains
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the length of two trains traveling on parallel tracks, one at 40 km/h and the other at 20 km/h. It is established that it takes two minutes longer for the trains to pass each other when moving in the same direction compared to when they are moving in opposite directions. By converting speeds to meters per minute and setting up equations based on the time taken to pass, the length of each train is calculated. The final conclusion reached is that each train measures 500 meters in length. This algebraic approach effectively demonstrates the relationship between speed, time, and distance in this scenario.
Ilikebugs
Messages
94
Reaction score
0
Two trains of equal length are on parallel tracks. One train is traveling at
40 km/h and the other at 20 km/h. It takes two minutes longer for the trains to
completely pass one another when going in the same direction, than when going
in opposite directions.
Determine the length of each train.

Is there a way to algebraically solve this
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would convert the speeds to m/min...

$$v\,\frac{\text{km}}{\text{hr}}\cdot\frac{1\text{ hr}}{60\text{ min}}\cdot\frac{1000\text{ m}}{1\text{ km}}=\frac{50}{3}v\,\frac{\text{m}}{\text{min}}$$

And so the speed of the faster train (in m/min) is:

$$v_F=\frac{2000}{3}$$

And the speed of the slower train is:

$$v_S=\frac{1000}{3}$$

In fact, we could write:

$$v_F=2v_S$$

Let's let the length of the trains be $\ell$.

Now, when the trains pass going in the same direction, we have:

$$(v_F-v_S)(t+2)=2\ell$$

or:

$$v_S(t+2)=2\ell$$

And when the trains pass going in the opposite direction, we have:

$$(v_F+v_S)t=2\ell$$

or:

$$3v_St=2\ell$$

Can you proceed?
 
t=1 so l=500m?
 
Last edited:
We have

$$3v_St=2L\quad(1)$$

and

$$v_S(t+2)=2L\quad(2)$$

Multiply $(2)$ by 3 and then subtract $(1)$ from the result:

$$3v_S(t+2)=6L\Rightarrow3v_St+6v_S=6L$$

$$6v_S=4L\Rightarrow v_S=\frac{2L}{3}\Rightarrow\frac{1000}{3}=\frac{2L}{3}\implies L=500\text{ m.}$$
 
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
7K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
66
Views
7K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K