This method may be more intuitive for some people.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jimmy87
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Emf Sources
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the rate of energy transferred to a 1.5V cell during charging, given a potential difference of 1.9V between two points in a circuit. The subject area includes concepts from electrical circuits and power calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply the power equation P = VI and questions the validity of using other power equations like P = I²R and P = V²/R in the context of a chemical cell. They explore the implications of internal resistance and the fixed voltage of the cell.

Discussion Status

Participants are engaging in clarifying the application of power equations in relation to ideal and non-ideal chemical cells. Some guidance is offered regarding the limitations of certain equations in this context, and there is an exploration of the relationship between power, voltage, and current in the circuit.

Contextual Notes

There is a discussion about the assumptions related to the ideal behavior of the chemical cell and its internal resistance, as well as the implications of using different power equations in this scenario.

Jimmy87
Messages
692
Reaction score
19

Homework Statement


upload_2019-2-11_19-20-51.png

Question - Calculate the rate of energy transferred to the 1.5V cell during charging if the potential between X and Y is 1.9V

Homework Equations


P = VI

The Attempt at a Solution


I think I understand how to get the answer. If XY has 1.9V then the resistor will get 0.4V. This will give a current of 0.44A (0.4V/0.6Ω). Using P=VI for the cell, I get 0.44A x 1.5V = 0.6W. However, thinking about it more I have a few questions. I was thinking about why I couldn't use other circuit power equations - P = I2R and P = V2/R but then I realized this would give the power delivered to the internal resistor and not the cell. However, if we work backwards and use P = V2/R for the cell to find R then what does this mean? i.e. we know it has a power of 0.6W and a voltage of 1.5V so R = V2/P = 3.75Ω. Is this right or is it not valid to use it in this context?

Thanks for any help offered.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2019-2-11_19-20-51.png
    upload_2019-2-11_19-20-51.png
    12.1 KB · Views: 700
Physics news on Phys.org
Jimmy87 said:
P = I2R
is for resistors where V = I##\times##R. In a (ideal) chemical cell the power is used for something, well, chemical :smile: and the voltage does not depend on the current. So you have to revert to P = V##\times##I

In your exercise the non-ideal chemical cell is modeled as an ideal cell with an internal series resistance.
To answer your question you could check that with e.g. a 0.1 ##\Omega## you would get a different answer.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jimmy87
BvU said:
is for resistors where V = I##\times##R. In a (ideal) chemical cell the power is used for something, well, chemical :smile: and the voltage does not depend on the current. So you have to revert to P = V##\times##I

In your exercise the non-ideal chemical cell is modeled as an ideal cell with an internal series resistance.
To answer your question you could check that with e.g. a 0.1 ##\Omega## you would get a different answer.

Thanks. So if I have understood you correctly you're saying that we can't use P = I2R because this equation comes from V = IR where the voltage across something depends on its current whereas for a cell its voltage is fixed regardless of the current through it?
 
Yep.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jimmy87
P=I^2R would be the power dissipated in the resistor rather than put into the battery.

One other way to do it would be to apply conservation of energy...

Power into battery = power supplied by the battery charger - power dissipated in resistor
= (1.9*0.44) - (0.4*0.44)
= 1.5*0.44
= 0.6W
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K