This questions stumbled all my classmates, see if you guys are smarter.

  • Thread starter Thread starter HashBrown
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a challenging problem involving a spring scale that can only weigh up to 25 KG, with participants tasked to find a way to determine the weight of an object exceeding that limit without using any scales or spring-related tools. Clarification is requested on the restrictions against using the provided spring scale. Participants are encouraged to think creatively and suggest common objects for potential solutions. The conversation hints at the possibility of simple, practical answers that do not involve complex or unconventional methods. The challenge emphasizes critical thinking and resourcefulness in problem-solving.
HashBrown
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Okay here is the 1 million dollar 100 bonus mark question...

If you have spring scale that can ONLY weighs no more than 25 KG. You have a mass that is MORE than 25 KG. How can you figure out the weight NOT using ANY SPRINGS, SCALES, OR ANYTHING ASSOCIATED WITH SPRINGS AND SCALES. Items MUST be common objects. (answer can't be too "wild")
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a bit more clarification on " NOT using ANY SPRINGS, SCALES" would be nice.

could you still use the spring scale you're already given.
 
HashBrown said:
If you have spring scale that can ONLY weighs no more than 25 KG. You have a mass that is MORE than 25 KG. How can you figure out the weight NOT using ANY SPRINGS, SCALES, OR ANYTHING ASSOCIATED WITH SPRINGS AND SCALES. Items MUST be common objects. (answer can't be too "wild")

There are lots of easy answers. Perhaps you could come up with some yourself.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Back
Top