Thought Experiment: "A Glimpse into Infinity"

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Anti10188
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion revolves around a thought experiment involving an indestructible, stationary bicycle wheel the size of a galaxy, continuously accelerating its rotation. The key focus is on how the wheel visually appears and perceptibly deforms as it approaches and surpasses the speed of light, highlighting the differences in rotational speed between the center and edges. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding relativistic effects, particularly in the context of the Ehrenfest paradox, which has been studied extensively in physics for over a century.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of relativistic physics concepts
  • Familiarity with the Ehrenfest paradox
  • Basic knowledge of astrophysics
  • Awareness of rotational dynamics in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Ehrenfest paradox and its implications in relativistic physics
  • Explore the effects of relativistic speeds on visual perception
  • Study the principles of rotational dynamics in astrophysical contexts
  • Investigate the concept of time dilation in relation to rotating objects
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics enthusiasts, students of astrophysics, and anyone interested in the implications of relativistic motion and visual perception in theoretical scenarios.

Anti10188
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Given:
  • An indestructible, stationary bicycle wheel the size of our galaxy.
  • An indestructible, stationary human observer positioned parallel to the wheel’s central axis, with a light source above him.
In this experiment, the wheel continuously accelerates its rotation.
Describe how this wheel would visually appear/perceptibly deform as it approaches and surpasses the speed of light. This is important because the rotational speed differs between the center and the edges.


My idols: Albert Einstein, Nikola Tesla, Richard Feynman, Jim Carrey.
Richard Feynman once said: "You must learn to doubt." (I allow breaking the laws of physics in this experiment.)
Also, I’ll add—I’m a "Yellow" in DISC psychology patterns, while most of you are "Blues."

Before you start telling me I know nothing about physics, please understand: I’m not a physicist. I don’t have a formal education in it. I learned/understood astrophysics in the way that worked for me.

Alright, now let’s add and relocate a copy of the observer to a point on the wheel where light is no longer visible. Would they still interact (the now-invisible parts of the wheel and the observer)?
I think not, because they would effectively exist in "different times" or "different spaces" (both terms seem correct to me).
English is not my nativ, most of it is auto translate.
This experiment, along with the previous post, was meant to inspire you—to offer an outside perspective.
 
  • Skeptical
  • Sad
Likes   Reactions: weirdoguy and PeroK
Physics news on Phys.org
Anti10188 said:
(I allow breaking the laws of physics in this experiment.)
However, when you do you lose the ability to use the laws of physics to work out what will happen - you're trying to apply the laws of physics after starting with the assumption that they don't apply.
That's not a starting point for a sensible discussion so this thread is closed.

People have been working with the physics of rotating relativistic disks for well over a century now, so googling for "Ehrenfest paradox" will bring up much good information.... And you'll find some good older threads here as well.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters, berkeman and PeroK

Similar threads

  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
7K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K