Three Charges - Electric Field Question

AI Thread Summary
Two charges, Qc and -Qc, are fixed on the x-axis, while a third charge, Qb, is at the origin. A particle with charge q is placed on the y-axis and released, resulting in calculated accelerations of ax = 238.19 m/s² and ay = 44.95 m/s². The discussion focuses on determining the net electric force on the particle, with initial confusion about calculating the force versus the electric field. After clarification, it was revealed that the correct magnitude of the electric force is 1.4543 N. This highlights the importance of distinguishing between electric force and electric field in calculations.
r34racer01
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
showmepl-5.gif


Two charges Qc and -Qc (Qc = 7 µC) are fixed on the x-axis at x = -6 cm and x = 6 cm, respectively. A third charge Qb = 1 µC is fixed at the origin.

A particle with charge q = 0.3 µC and mass m = 6 g is placed on the y-axis at y = 10 cm and released. There is no gravity.

(a) Calculate the initial acceleration of the particle.
ax = 238.19m/s^2
ay = 44.95m/s^2
(b) What was the magnitude of the net electric force on q at its point of release?
F = ?N


F = kQq/r^2 E = F/q = KQ/r^2

Ok so the first part wasn't bad. I just figured out what directions the Coulomb force vectors would be in for eack force, and then resolved thos into their x and y components, summed them and then set them equal to m*a and got
ax = 238.19m/s^2 and ay = 44.95m/s^2

Now part b is where I'm getting really stuck. The electric field vectors point in the same direction as the coulomb force vectors, so I basically did the same as above.

E(Qb) = k(1e-6) / 0.1^2 = 899000
E(Qc) = k(7e-6) / 0.1166^2 = 4628717.02
E(Qc)x = 2381887.8 E(Qc)y = 3968832.6
E(Q-c) = k(-7e-6) / 0.1166^2 = -4628717.02
E(Q-c)x = 2381887.8 E(Q-c)y = -3968832.6

The The Qc y components should cancel out and its x components will basically double so then the answer should be F = sqrt( 899000^2 + (2*2381887.8)^2) = 4847859.7N
But that's not the right answer. Can someone PLEASE HELP!
 

Attachments

  • showmepl-5.gif
    showmepl-5.gif
    774 bytes · Views: 472
Physics news on Phys.org
In your solution to part a, you must have first calculated the force components before computing the acceleration. Why not use those results to find the magnitude of the force? (Note that part b asks for the electric force, not the electric field.)
 
Doc Al said:
In your solution to part a, you must have first calculated the force components before computing the acceleration. Why not use those results to find the magnitude of the force? (Note that part b asks for the electric force, not the electric field.)

Oh man I can't believe I made that mistake, that means I had the answer days ago. Thanks you so much Doc Al, I would have never noticed that, the answer turned out to be 1.4543N if anyone was wondering.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top