Three Dimensional Charge Density in Capacitor Plates

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating three-dimensional charge density in capacitor plates, emphasizing that charge primarily resides on the surface due to electrostatic principles. It is noted that in a steady state, there is no net electric field within a conductor, resulting in zero net charge in the interior. The conversation highlights computational methods like the Method of Moments for analyzing charge distribution under uniform voltage conditions. Additionally, it acknowledges that in real-world scenarios involving imperfect conductors, time-varying voltages can lead to charge density appearing in the interior, requiring more complex modeling. Overall, the consensus is that for ideal conductors, charge density is effectively a surface phenomenon.
Conservation
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,

I was wondering how one would calculate the three-dimensional charge density (per volume) in a capacitor plate with a given thickness. I know how to calculate the charge density on the surface based on the capacitance and voltage, but how would one calculate the comprehensive charge density that also incorporates the charge distribution in the direction of the thickness?

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, the charge will reside only on the surface of the plate, so the thickness is more or less immaterial. You can model the plate as a two dimensional plate then. You can then use various computational techniques to calculate the charge distribution due to a known voltage. One method is the Method of Moments and the case of the charge on a plate at uniform voltage is solved in Harrington's text, "Method of Moments." Balanis' "Advanced Engineering Electromagnetics" discusses integral methods. While he does not do the plate problem, one can learn enough to knock out a code in Matlab for example.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
I see. Thanks for a detailed answer for the calculation process.

However, does the charge truly reside only on the surface? I mean, there are still electrons in regions that are not the surface directly in contact with the dielectric which would be attracted to the opposite plate, causing an uneven electron distribution, right?
 
Electrostatics is concerned with the steady state solution. So if there was any net electric field on the interior of the conducting plate, then it would simply whisk away the charges as a result. The only way that we reach a steady state is having no net electric field on the interior of a conductor. Or in other words, the voltage difference between any two interior points is zero. For this to be true, then there cannot be any net charge in the interior.

So regardless of what configuration of charge we can think of, when we let them move about in response to each other they will always end up with a net charge only on the surface of conductors.

Now electrodynamics can allow for a net charge density to appear in the interior of imperfect conductors, like real world copper. In this case, we would have to model a capacitor that has a time-varying voltage across it and the charges would permeate into the interior based upon the conductivity of the metal and the frequency of the time-varying fields. But to solve that case we have to use a more complicated set of equations, but we can still use the Method of Moments as the solver.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top