Three dimensional Lie algebra L with dim L' = 1

valtz
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Now suppose the derived algebra has dimension 1. Then there exits some non-zero X_{1} \in g such that L' = span{X_{1}}. Extend this to a basis {X_{1};X_{2};X_{3}} for g. Then there exist scalars$\alpha, \beta , \gamma \in R (not all zero) such that
[X_{1},X_{2}] = \alpha X_{1}
[X_{1},X_{3}] = \beta X_{1}
[X_{2},X_{3}] = \gamma X_{1}
Suppose ##\alpha \neq 0##. Then construct a new basis, as follows:
e_{1} = X_{1}
e_{2} = \frac{1}{\alpha} X_{2}
e_{3} = \alpha X_{3} - \beta X_{2} + \gamma X_{1}
Since ##\alpha \neq 0##, by assumption, this is a basis for the Lie algebra g. Let us
calculate the Lie brackets for this basis:
[e_{1},e_{2}] = e_{1}
[e_{1},e_{2}] = 0
[e_{1},e_{2}] = 0
This Lie algebra is seen to be the direct sum of two Lie algebras, two dimensional non abelian lie algebra \oplus 1 dimensional lie algebra

i get this from pdf in internet , i want to ask, how can that be the direct sum of two lie algebra , two dimensional non abelian lie algebra \oplus 1 dimensional lie algebra

what use from construct new basis here? what can we see from construct new basis here?
i'm sorry before, please give me a detail explanation, because my essay is about lie algebra. so I'm a little new about lie algebra

source pdf where i get : http://math.ucsd.edu/~abowers/downloads/survey/3d_Lie_alg_classify.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
We have the Heisenberg algebra spanned by ##\{\,e_1,e_2,e_3\,\}## here. It is ##\mathfrak{g}= \mathfrak{Z(g)} \oplus [\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}]##. Since both, center and derived Lie algebra are ideals, it is a direct sum of Lie algebras, not only vector spaces. The two dimensional part, the center ##\mathfrak{Z(g)}=\langle e_2,e_3 \rangle## is Abelian.

Another way to see it is to observe that ##\mathfrak{g}/[\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}]## is always Abelian. Since ##[\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}]## is one dimensional and ##\mathfrak{g}## three dimensional, ##\mathfrak{g}/[\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}]## is two dimensional and Abelian.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
Back
Top