Three dimensional torque questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter pchalla90
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Torque
AI Thread Summary
Torque problems in three dimensions involve considering how forces act around multiple axes, particularly when dealing with objects that have depth. In the given scenario, the position of the pirate relative to the center of mass and the support point of the plank affects the torque calculation. If the plank is symmetrical and perpendicular to gravity, the thickness may not influence the outcome, but the support points do. When forces are applied at different coordinates, they create torque around both the x and y axes, complicating the analysis. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurately determining how far the pirate must walk to fall off the plank.
pchalla90
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
how would you do torque problems, except in three dimensions?

my knowledge is limited to basically planks or other bars that can be considered to be two d.

for example, a 6m, 10kg plank has 2 meters hanging off the side of the pirate ship. how far does the 50kg pirate have to walk from the side of the ship to fall into the water?

well that's simple.

but now let's assume that the plank has a third dimension. let's say it's a square with a certain depth. what if he's walkign closer to one edge than the other?

if we're looking at this situation from above.

the square contains the points (3,3), (-3,3), (-3,-3), and (3, -3). the center of mass is at the origin. the ship's edge is along the line x=1. the pirate is walking along the line y=-2.

how does that affect how far he has to walk?

this isn't homework. just general curiosity. :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just intuitively, I would think that if the plank has symmetry about its CG and it is perpendicular to the normal force of gravity, its "thickness" won't matter.
 
true, but that wasn't what i was wondering about either way. i shouldn't've mentioned thickness. it's besides the point... sorry about that
 
Statics. Say you are still dealing with a force straight down. That keeps it easy.
In your example the force can only act around x=1 no matter where you place the force along Y. But if the plank were only supported at a point (1,1) then your force can act around x=1 and y=1. So, you have torque or a moment around both.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top