Three forces - in equilibrium or not?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of equilibrium in physics, specifically regarding three forces. A newcomer seeks clarification on whether their understanding of the forces is correct. Responses confirm that the forces are not in equilibrium from left to right. It is suggested that the individual should include relevant equations to support their analysis. The conversation emphasizes the importance of mathematical proof in determining equilibrium.
shin777
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Three forces -- in equilibrium or not?

Hi. I am new to physics and need some help on this question asap. Did I get it right or is it wrong? Correct me if I am wrong. Thank you.

332qd0k.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks good.
 
You are correct. It's not in equilibrium left to right but your working should really include the equation that proves it. eg...

33Cos(30) - 20Cos(22) <> 0
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Which one is a correct statement about oscillation?
Replies
24
Views
1K
Static equilibrium | Uniform sphere on incline | Determining friction
Replies
43
Views
2K
Spring-mediated dipole in a magnetic field
Replies
31
Views
2K
What is meant by small oscillations for this potential energy function?
Replies
2
Views
760
Solving Equilibrium w/ Plank & Forces | Physics Problem
Replies
7
Views
4K
Understanding the generic nature of linearity in Physics
Replies
2
Views
944
Frequency of pendulum in the presence of electric field
Replies
16
Views
1K
To what extent does this system behave as a pendulum?
Replies
1
Views
849
Equilibrium problem: Multiple forces acting on this hinged, supported beam
Replies
3
Views
1K
Can 3 forces of 9N, 4N, and 6N be in equilibrium?
Replies
9
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top