Thrust angle calculation for off-centerline airplane engine

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the thrust angle for an off-centerline airplane engine, specifically in the context of an RC seaplane. Participants explore the mechanics of balancing moments created by thrust acting above the center of gravity (CG) and the necessary angle adjustments to counteract pitch-down moments. The conversation includes mathematical reasoning and attempts to solve for the angle using trigonometric relationships.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a scenario involving an RC seaplane with an engine mounted above and aft of the CG, leading to a need to angle the engine down to balance moments.
  • The participant sets up the equation (TsinA)y=(TcosA)x to balance the moments, where T is thrust, A is the motor angle, y is the position behind the CG, and x is the position above the CG.
  • They derive the equation 4sinA=cosA and express uncertainty about solving it algebraically, suggesting graphing the functions f(x)=4sinA and g(x)=cosA as a potential method.
  • Another participant points out that by applying the relationship sin(A)/cos(A)=tan(A), they can derive that tan(A)=1/4, leading to an approximate angle of 14°.
  • There is a clarification on how to arrive at tan(A)=1/4 through algebraic manipulation of the original equation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the mathematical approach to derive the angle, but there is some initial uncertainty regarding the algebraic manipulation and the method of solving the equation.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not resolve the potential complexities of the physical setup or the assumptions made regarding the thrust and its effects on the aircraft's stability.

aerohead_18
Messages
33
Reaction score
4
This isn't for any particular project or assignment, but I've tried solving this in the past and haven't figured it out. Say you have an RC seaplane, like the one pictured, with the engine mounted well above and aft the CG. You're going to need to angle it down a little to counteract the pitch-down moment produced by the thrust acting above the CG.

imgres.jpg


Here's what I have so far.
Let's say the motor is 16" behind the CG and 4" above it, and it's generating 5lbs of thrust. To balance the moments, you would set it up like:

(TsinA)y=(TcosA)x

where T=thrust, A=motor angle from x-axis, y=position behind the CG, and x=position above the CG. Plugging in the values:

(5sinA)16=(5cosA)4
...which reduces to:
4sinA=cosA

As far as I know there isn't any way to solve that algebraically. The only way I could think of to solve for A might be graphing the functions f(x)=4sinA and g(x)=cosA and maybe use one of the solutions to find the angle where the two thrust components are equal. Below are the two functions graphed and some of their solutions.

Screen Shot 2016-05-12 at 8.57.24 PM.png


So, assuming I'm on the right track, where do I go from here? I initially thought the x-value of each solution would be a possible motor angle, but if you plug that back into the equation above the two sides aren't equal. So how on Earth would I do this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
aerohead_18 said:
This isn't for any particular project or assignment, but I've tried solving this in the past and haven't figured it out. Say you have an RC seaplane, like the one pictured, with the engine mounted well above and aft the CG. You're going to need to angle it down a little to counteract the pitch-down moment produced by the thrust acting above the CG.

View attachment 100647

Here's what I have so far.
Let's say the motor is 16" behind the CG and 4" above it, and it's generating 5lbs of thrust. To balance the moments, you would set it up like:

(TsinA)y=(TcosA)x

where T=thrust, A=motor angle from x-axis, y=position behind the CG, and x=position above the CG. Plugging in the values:

(5sinA)16=(5cosA)4
...which reduces to:
4sinA=cosA

As far as I know there isn't any way to solve that algebraically. The only way I could think of to solve for A might be graphing the functions f(x)=4sinA and g(x)=cosA and maybe use one of the solutions to find the angle where the two thrust components are equal. Below are the two functions graphed and some of their solutions.

View attachment 100645

So, assuming I'm on the right track, where do I go from here? I initially thought the x-value of each solution would be a possible motor angle, but if you plug that back into the equation above the two sides aren't equal. So how on Earth would I do this?
As long as you have the same angle A on both sides of the equation, carry the trigonometry forward a little bit:

4 sin (A) = cos (A)

##\frac{sin (A)}{cos (A)} = tan (A) = \frac{1}{4}##

##tan^{-1} (A) = A = tan^{-1} (\frac{1}{4}) ≈ 14° ##

where tan-1 is the arctangent function.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: aerohead_18
Okay, that makes sense. Forgot about the sin(A)/cos(A)=tan(A) rule. How did you know that tanA=1/4?
 
aerohead_18 said:
Okay, that makes sense. Forgot about the sin(A)/cos(A)=tan(A) rule. How did you know that tanA=1/4?
You do the algebra on both sides of the equation.

You divide both sides of the equation by cos (A) to get tan (A) on the LHS, which leaves 1 on the RHS.
You then divide both sides of the equation to get just tan (A) on the LHS, which means the RHS is now 1/4.

So, tan (A) = 1/4
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: aerohead_18
SteamKing said:
You do the algebra on both sides of the equation.

You divide both sides of the equation by cos (A) to get tan (A) on the LHS, which leaves 1 on the RHS.
You then divide both sides of the equation to get just tan (A) on the LHS, which means the RHS is now 1/4.

So, tan (A) = 1/4
Got it. Thanks!
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
16K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
11K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
3K