Thrust for Car Acceleration: Understanding Piston Engine Force

AI Thread Summary
Thrust can be used to describe the force that accelerates a typical piston engine car, calculated by multiplying engine torque by the overall gear ratio and accounting for drivetrain losses. The resulting thrust is derived from the driven tire torque divided by the tire radius. There is some confusion surrounding the term "thrust," as it is often associated with aviation and not typically used in automotive contexts. While the force applied by tires does create a reaction force on the Earth, the traditional definition of thrust may not fully encompass this scenario. Ultimately, the discussion highlights the nuances in terminology when comparing automotive and aerospace dynamics.
howbabbyform?
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Can thrust be used to describe the force used to accelerate a typical car (piston engine)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, the engine torque is multiplied by the overall gear ratio (transmission and rear end) and after losses in the drive train are accounted for, ends up as torque applied to the driven tires. The "thrust" equals the driven tire torque divided by the driven tire radius.
 
It's a bit different if Howbabbyform (where the hell did that name come from? :confused:) is trying to equate hp to the thrust as measured from a jet or rocket. That ratio changes with speed and atmospheric pressure.
 
(where the hell did that name come from? )

parody of a yahoo answers question. http://www.somethingawful.com/flash/shmorky/babby.swf

The reason why I ask the question is because on a separate forum I was saying that you can find thrust of a car with engine torque, gear ratios and tire radius (not including parasitic drag of the drive train). Someone told me that thrust wasn't the correct term to use and when I searched for better descriptions of thrust, all I could find had to do with aviation.
 
The wiki definition wouldn't appear to the force generated by the tires, because it defines thrust as the reaction force to acceleration of some mass (such as acceleration of air by a propeller, or acceleration of spent fuel by a rocket engine).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thrust

However the force applied by the tires to the Earth results in a very tiny amount of linear and angular acceleration of the earth, which "reacts" with a forwards force on the tires, so could this be called "thrust"?

I misunderstood your original question, thinking it was about the math and not about the terminology. Thrust is normally used to refer to reaction force from the acceleration gases and fluids, but the wiki definition doesn't include this restriction.
 
howbabbyform? said:
parody of a yahoo answers question.

:smile:
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top