Tight Binding Model: mathematics

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mathematical aspects of the tight binding model, specifically focusing on the summation involved in the equations presented in a textbook by Omar. Participants seek clarification on the transition between double summations and the implications of certain assumptions in the equations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation, Homework-related, Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant requests clarification on a specific summation from the textbook, indicating confusion about the mathematical steps involved.
  • Another participant attempts to clarify the nature of the summation, suggesting that it can be expressed as a repeated summand multiplied by the number of terms, N.
  • A participant expresses uncertainty about the transition from a double summation to a new form with a different index, particularly noting the condition that Xj' = 0.
  • There is a mention of the function of the difference, Xj - Xj', and how the summation behaves consistently for each choice of j', leading to further confusion.
  • One participant suggests creating a concrete example with N=5 to illustrate the summands and clarify the process.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion remains unresolved, with participants expressing confusion and seeking clarification on various aspects of the summation without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not fully articulated the assumptions underlying the summation, and there are unresolved questions regarding the mathematical steps and the implications of setting Xj' = 0.

Waxterzz
Messages
82
Reaction score
0
From the textbook of Omar:

nkIVr83.jpg


Can someone explain me the summation of this? I simply don't get it?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Which summation do you mean?
The second equation is the first one with the argument that the sum over j' looks like "something"+"something"+...+"something" (N times the same summand) = N*"something".
 
mfb said:
Which summation do you mean?
The second equation is the first one with the argument that the sum over j' looks like "something"+"something"+...+"something" (N times the same summand) = N*"something".

I don't get how you go from the double summation to the new one with the new index etc.

Oh yeah i forgot to say: in the new expression they put Xj' = 0.

It's a function of the difference, Xj-Xj'. For each choice of j',the sum over j yields the same result. => I don't get it.

Also I don't get why you start from -N/2 and end with (N-1)/2
 
Make an example. Write down all summands for N=5 and see how it works out.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K