Time and time intervals when using kinematic equations

AI Thread Summary
A space vehicle accelerates uniformly from 85 m/s to 462 m/s over 10 seconds, prompting a discussion on calculating average acceleration and displacement between specific time intervals. The correct displacement was found using the formula x = x0 + vit + 1/2at² for the times 2s and 6s, but confusion arose regarding the use of Δx = vit + 1/2at² with a Δt of 4 seconds. The key issue was the initial velocity value used; the correct initial velocity at 2 seconds needed to be calculated instead of using the starting velocity of 85 m/s. Participants emphasized the importance of understanding how to apply kinematic equations correctly in relation to time intervals. Clarifying these concepts helped resolve the confusion around displacement calculations.
nerf225
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
1. A space vehicle accelerates uniformly from 85 m/s at t=0s to 462 m/s at t=10s. What is avg acceleration? How far did the space vehicle move from t=2s to t=6s.

2. Got the avg accel easily enough w basic equation for accel. Problem is conceptual with the displacement portion of the question.

3. I got the correct answer by using x=xo + vit + 1/2at2 for t=2s and t=6s and then basically did Δx= x6s-x2s.

BUT...I don't understand why I can't just use Δx=vit + 1/2at2 with t=4 because the time difference between 6s and 2s is 4s. Isn't the t in that equation essentially a Δt? Shouldn't putting 4 in there tell me the distance it will travel in 4 s?

And why do I get a third different answer if I use: Δx=1/2(vi+vf)Δt?


I seem to be confused about what Δx means and when t vs. Δt is used. Or something. Ugh. Sorry. Help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you tell me what are your results?
 
nerf225 said:
BUT...I don't understand why I can't just use ##\Delta x = v_i t+\frac 12 at^2## with t=4 because the time difference between 6s and 2s is 4s. Isn't the t in that equation essentially a Δt? Shouldn't putting 4 in there tell me the distance it will travel in 4 s?
It will, but you need to plug in the right value for vi. What value did you use?
 
Draw the graph and show us how you did it.
 
nerf225 said:
3. I got the correct answer by using x=xo + vit + 1/2at2 for t=2s and t=6s and then basically did Δx= x6s-x2s.

BUT...I don't understand why I can't just use Δx=vit + 1/2at2 with t=4 because the time difference between 6s and 2s is 4s. Isn't the t in that equation essentially a Δt? Shouldn't putting 4 in there tell me the distance it will travel in 4 s?


You say you got the correct result for the distance covered between those times by taking the difference of the results. Using symbols for the two times, say ##t_a## and ##t_b## for the 2s and 6s times, write out the two expressions for the total distance using the formula. Take the difference of the two expressions and collect the terms. Can you spot the problem with just plugging in ##Δt = t_b - t_a## into your formula?
 
Haruspex -- Thank you! THAT was it! I was plugging in 85 m/s as the initial velocity, not calculating the initial velocity at 2 s and plugging that in. UGH! Smh. Thank you everyone for commenting and being willing to try to help! :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top