Time as Dimension: Before & After Einstein's G.T.R.

  • Thread starter Thread starter karkas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimension Time
AI Thread Summary
Time has been conceptualized as a dimension in various contexts long before Einstein's General Theory of Relativity (G.T.R.), with earlier diagrams illustrating movement incorporating time. The classification of time as a dimension serves practical purposes in physics, aiding in the visualization of movement and the definition of transformations between physical quantities. In General Relativity, this concept becomes particularly significant, allowing for a more comprehensive understanding of spacetime. The discussion raises questions about the nature of "dimension" itself and whether using time as a component in vectors qualifies it as a dimension. Overall, the understanding of time as a dimension has evolved, but its roots predate Einstein's contributions.
karkas
Messages
131
Reaction score
1
Since when is Time considered to be a dimension?

Is it after Einstein's G.T.R. or was it considered to be one before it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
karkas said:
Since when is Time considered to be a dimension?

Is it after Einstein's G.T.R. or was it considered to be one before it?

People have used diagrams with time as a dimension long before Einstein/Minkowski. For example in order to visualize movement with a static diagram. There is nothing special about considering a physical quantity to be a dimension. But in GR it proves very useful.
 
The concept of "dimension" and "vector" is just a way for us to keep from mixing different units and also to more easily define any transforms of conserved quantities that there might be between those dimensions, if any. For example, in a Euclidean space, transforms preserve distance. Also, one can imagine spaces in which the transforms are different depending on the particular dimensions involved.
 
Last edited:
Well ... first of all .. what is "dimension"? Whenever you use time or any other physical quantity as the component of some vector (including space components), is it enough to consider it as a dimension ?
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
20
Views
987
Replies
13
Views
1K
Back
Top