1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Homework Help: Time at given speed in freefall

  1. Jan 24, 2004 #1
    Here is a problem from my book:

    If a car rolls gently (initial velocity = 0) off a vertical cliff, how long does it take to reach 90km/h?

    It seems easy, and I have been breezing through all teh other ones like it's my job, but for some reason this one gets me. I knwo it's possible, but I jsut don't know how. The answer is supposed to be 2.6 seconds, but I somehow always wind up dividing 90 by 9.8. Any help?
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 24, 2004 #2


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Are you familiar with the expression:

    [tex]v(t) = v_0 + \frac{1}{2} a t^2[/tex]?

    Just solve it for t.

    - Warren
  4. Jan 24, 2004 #3
    Alright, thanks...but I still seem to get the wrong answer consistently. I do:


    what is going wrong?
  5. Jan 24, 2004 #4


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Convert 90 km/hr into m/s first, so that your units will agree.

    - Warren
  6. Jan 24, 2004 #5
    Thanks, I don't know how I skipped that. That's what happened on the quiz, too. Did all of them perfectly, then on one forgot to convert.

    Also, is it jsut me, or should I really end up with about 2.26 seconds?
    Last edited: Jan 24, 2004
  7. Jan 25, 2004 #6
    I get 2.258769757 on my calculator using g = 9.8 m/s^2.

    Does the problem explicitly say we can ignore air resistance?
  8. Jan 25, 2004 #7


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Chroot: I must confess that during the several days I spent in calculus (and physics) class, I never saw an equation that said
    "[tex]v(t) = v_0 + \frac{1}{2} a t^2[/tex]"

    I do recall seeing one that said "[tex]v(t)= v_0+ at[/tex]" and one that said "[tex]d(t)= d_0+ v_0t+ \frac{1}{2}at^2[/tex]".

    Assuming no air resistance and that a= -9.8 m/s2, with v0= 0, v(t)= -9.8 t m/s. Since there are 1000m in a km and 60*60= 3600 sec in and hour, -90 km/hr= -90 *1000/3600= -25 m/s.
    -25= -9.8 t so t= 25/9.8= 2.55 seconds.

    Looks pretty easy to me (as long as you don't listen to Chroot!).

    (C'mon, who is it that's using Chroot's good name?)
  9. Jan 25, 2004 #8
    I'm sure it was just an oversight. :smile:.
    Last edited: Jan 25, 2004
  10. Jan 25, 2004 #9


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member


    *slinks into a corner and hides*

    - Warren
  11. Jan 25, 2004 #10
    Or you can use

    v^2 = v0^2 + 2aΔx.

    Solve for Δx and then time is just Δx/v.
  12. Jan 25, 2004 #11
    Optimus, you can't do that because once you've solved for the distance its fallen, dividing by v means you are assuming that the velocity is constant, which it obviously isn't.
  13. Jan 27, 2004 #12


    I blindly assumed chroot's equation was correct.

    Give me back the two minutes of my life I wasted!
  14. Jan 27, 2004 #13
    Besides, x is not given.
  15. Jan 27, 2004 #14
    Actually, under a constant acceleration, you can compute the time using the average velocity.

    Given the final velocity and displacement, to solve for t:

    [tex]t = \frac{2 d}{V_f}[/tex] or

    [tex]\frac{V_f}{2} = \frac{d}{t}[/tex]

    Vf/2 when Vi=0 and acceleration is constant gives the average velocity.
    Last edited: Jan 27, 2004
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook