Time average vs. phase space average

iomtt6076
Messages
42
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


For a given total energy E0 compute and compare a time average and a phase space average of x2 for the harmonic oscillator. The one-dimensional Hamiltonian is

H = \frac{p^2}{2m}+\frac{m\omega^2}{2}x^2

Reminder: the time average is defined as

\langle x^2\rangle =\frac{1}{t}\int_0^t x^2\tau\,d\tau

we will be mostly interested in the long time limit. The phase space average is

\overline{x}^2=\frac{\int\delta (E_0-H)x^2\,dx\,dp}{\int\delta (E_0-H)\,dx\,dp}


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

First, for the time average, all I can think of is that for a harmonic oscillator x = a\cos (\sqrt{k/m}t+\phi ). I can then substitute this in the given integral for time average, which I can then evaluate. The problem is that I don't know what a and \phi are given the information in the problem.

Any hints/suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The amplitude a can be calclated since the energy E0 is given.
The initial phase \phi doesn't affect the average x2.

By the way, the definition of the time average has wrong dimension. Is it a typing error?
 
Thank you for the reply.

Maxim Zh said:
The amplitude a can be calclated since the energy E0 is given.

Yes, I've now found out that E = (1/2)m\omega^2 A^2.

Maxim Zh said:
By the way, the definition of the time average has wrong dimension. Is it a typing error?

Well, I've copied it exactly the way it shows up on the problem set, so maybe the professor made a typo?
 
The common time average definition is:

<br /> &lt;f(t)&gt; = \frac{1}{t} \int_0^t f(\tau)\,d\tau.<br />

May be the brackets around the \tau are missed in your definition?
 
Okay, I see what you're saying; I agree it should be

\frac{1}{t}\int_0^t x^2(\tau)\,d\tau

Thanks, I got it now.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top