Time average vs. phase space average

iomtt6076
Messages
42
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


For a given total energy E0 compute and compare a time average and a phase space average of x2 for the harmonic oscillator. The one-dimensional Hamiltonian is

H = \frac{p^2}{2m}+\frac{m\omega^2}{2}x^2

Reminder: the time average is defined as

\langle x^2\rangle =\frac{1}{t}\int_0^t x^2\tau\,d\tau

we will be mostly interested in the long time limit. The phase space average is

\overline{x}^2=\frac{\int\delta (E_0-H)x^2\,dx\,dp}{\int\delta (E_0-H)\,dx\,dp}


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

First, for the time average, all I can think of is that for a harmonic oscillator x = a\cos (\sqrt{k/m}t+\phi ). I can then substitute this in the given integral for time average, which I can then evaluate. The problem is that I don't know what a and \phi are given the information in the problem.

Any hints/suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The amplitude a can be calclated since the energy E0 is given.
The initial phase \phi doesn't affect the average x2.

By the way, the definition of the time average has wrong dimension. Is it a typing error?
 
Thank you for the reply.

Maxim Zh said:
The amplitude a can be calclated since the energy E0 is given.

Yes, I've now found out that E = (1/2)m\omega^2 A^2.

Maxim Zh said:
By the way, the definition of the time average has wrong dimension. Is it a typing error?

Well, I've copied it exactly the way it shows up on the problem set, so maybe the professor made a typo?
 
The common time average definition is:

<br /> &lt;f(t)&gt; = \frac{1}{t} \int_0^t f(\tau)\,d\tau.<br />

May be the brackets around the \tau are missed in your definition?
 
Okay, I see what you're saying; I agree it should be

\frac{1}{t}\int_0^t x^2(\tau)\,d\tau

Thanks, I got it now.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top