Time before visit number one, random walk

Paalfaal
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hi there!

I'm working on a random walk-problem my professor gave me.

Given a MC with the following properties:
P0,0 = 1 - p
P0,1 = p
Pi,i-1 = 1 - pi
Pi,i+1 = pi
i \in[1,∞)
Xn: state at step number n

The chain is irreducible and ergodic and 0 < p ≤ 1

introducing N:
N = {min n > 0 : Xn = 15 | X0 = n0}

The problem to be calculated is:

P(N \geq 1000).
for n0 = 0
and n0 = 10




My thoughts:

P(N \geq 1000) = 1 - P(N < 1000) = 1 - [P(N = 999) + P(N = 998) + ...]

Now here's where it gets tricky (I think). It is very hard to determine an exact solution sice the markov property causes the chain to 'forget' if it has been to a state before. That is, we don't know if it's the first time we visit a state when we visit a state (correct me if I'm wrong here, but there is no 'easy' way to solve this problem).

By 'calculate' I wonder if he really means 'approximate'. Since Pi,i+1 gets so small for large i the answer can be approximated to:
P(N \geq 1000) ≈ 1 - Ʃk=1998 Pi,14kP14,15
= 1 - P14,15Ʃk=1998Pi,14k
(don't worry about my summation shenanigans. MATLAB can solve this for me)
Obviously this approximation can only be good for realtively small p, and n0



I really want your thoughts on this problem. Are there any solutions that are more 'correct' than mine? Thank you
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If you make X=15 an absorbing state, you could write the solution in terms of powers of a 16 by 16 matrix.
 
bpet said:
If you make X=15 an absorbing state, you could write the solution in terms of powers of a 16 by 16 matrix.

Of course! Thank you very much :smile:
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top