Time-dep perturbation theory

omyojj
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
while I`m reading the griffiths` textbook..

got my curiosity from "Typically, the diagonal matrix elements of H` vanish"

i.e. <a|H`|a>=0 in general..

If V(x) does not have an angular dependence..

the selection rule implies <a|H`|a>=0 (since Δl=0)..yes..

but what if it does?

what it(vanishing diagonal element of H`) means
physically (in view of the perturbation theory)

sorry for my bad english..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the diagonal elements of the perturbation didn't vanish, then they wouldn't perturb the system but be a small addtion to the unperturbed eigenvalue or another eigenstate.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top