Time dependent position given position dependent force

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem involving a particle influenced by a force F(x) = -kx^−2. The potential energy function U(x) is determined to be k/x, and the challenge lies in integrating to find the time t for the particle to reach the origin from an initial position x0. Participants suggest that while the integration appears complex, a change of variables could simplify the process by yielding a dimensionless integral. Additionally, they emphasize that the relationship between time, x0, k, and m can be established through dimensional analysis. The conversation highlights the importance of showing work for effective assistance and clarifies that the approach taken is fundamentally sound.
scoopaloop
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A particle of mass m is subject to a force F(x) = −kx^−2 (1) that attracts it toward the origin. (a) Determine the potential energy function U(x), defined by F(x) = − d U(x)/dx. (b) Assuming that the particle is released from rest at a position x0, show that the time t required for the particle to reach the origin is t = π sqrt(m/8k)(x_0)^(3/2)

Homework Equations


dt=dx/sqrt(2(E-U)/m)

The Attempt at a Solution


So, I found The potential energy to be k/x using that and the fact that at v=0 at x_0, I get dt=dx/sqrt(2((k/x_0)-k/x)/m). My only problem is integrating this I get a long nasty function that I feel I can't get x isolated. Maybe, I'm being lazy and need to gut through it, but is there an easier way to approach this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
scoopaloop said:
My only problem is integrating this I get a long nasty function that I feel I can't get x isolated.
If we are to have any chance of helping you, you need to actually show us what you did.
 
I just want to know if this is the correct approach or if there is another way. I'm not asking you to do it for me. I'd imagine you either know how to do this problem or you don't, I don't see how writing some long pain in the butt equation will help you know how to do the problem.
 
Last edited:
The approach is fine, but you seem to be doing it wrong. You can easily factor out the dependence on ##x_0## by a change of variables and obtain a dimensionless integral.

You can also argue for the correct dependence of the time on ##x_0##, ##k##, and ##m## purely on dimensional grounds. There is only one combination of these parameters which results in a time. Of course, you still need to perform the integral to get the correct prefactor.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top