Time dilation due to SR plus GR

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of total time dilation as it relates to both special relativity (SR) and general relativity (GR). Participants explore how to calculate time dilation in various scenarios involving high velocities and gravitational fields, seeking equations or models that can represent these effects in different contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty about whether total time dilation can be represented as the product of time dilation due to velocity and gravity, seeking clarification on this point.
  • Another participant suggests using the Schwarzschild solution for cases involving high velocity near massive objects, indicating that gravitational and velocity-based time dilation can be decomposed when considering static observers.
  • For scenarios without gravitational influence, it is noted that the concept of absolute velocity does not exist, complicating the analysis.
  • One participant proposes focusing on round trips for measuring time dilation, emphasizing the need for a well-defined method of comparing clocks.
  • There is a suggestion that the Schwarzschild metric can describe total time dilation for both velocity and gravitational effects, although this remains a point of inquiry.
  • Another participant confirms that the metric can be used to calculate trip time and elapsed time for observers, but it is unclear if this confirms the previous statement about total time dilation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the formulation of total time dilation or the applicability of the Schwarzschild metric in all cases discussed. Multiple competing views and uncertainties remain regarding the decomposition of time dilation effects.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in defining velocity in the absence of gravitational effects and the challenges of applying the Schwarzschild solution to arbitrary spacetimes. There is also an emphasis on the need for specific coordinate systems to accurately calculate time dilation.

powerplayer
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
So I've been trying to find an equation that will represent total time dilation.

I've looked through a couple threads and it seems the consensus of the threads I've seen on the topic say that total time dilation is the product of time dilation due to velocity and gravity. But I'm not clear on it and would like to be sure.

Here are a few example situations that I'd like to know how the total time dilation worked:

1. Your traveling straight with a very high velocity and you pass a massive object with close proximity.

2. You orbit a massive object with high velocity.

3. you travel at high velocity with no gravity effecting you.

4. you maintain 0 velocity in a strong gravitational field.

are there any equations(or derived equations) that will describe the total time dilation for all these situations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
powerplayer said:
So I've been trying to find an equation that will represent total time dilation.

I've looked through a couple threads and it seems the consensus of the threads I've seen on the topic say that total time dilation is the product of time dilation due to velocity and gravity. But I'm not clear on it and would like to be sure.

Here are a few example situations that I'd like to know how the total time dilation worked:

1. Your traveling straight with a very high velocity and you pass a massive object with close proximity.

2. You orbit a massive object with high velocity.

3. you travel at high velocity with no gravity effecting you.

4. you maintain 0 velocity in a strong gravitational field.

are there any equations(or derived equations) that will describe the total time dilation for all these situations?
For cases 1 and 2 you can use the Schwarzschild solution. If you are interested in the velocity with respect to static observers you can decompose the gravitational and velocity based time dilation. Thus the velocity with respect to arbitrary observers simply becomes a calculation.

For case 3 you would have to describe the velocity with respect to something else as there is no such thing as absolute velocity. Of course in all cases the gravitational part would be zero.

For case 4 you have to be more specific. In case of the Schwarzschild solution it is simple because if we take the velocity with respect to stationary observers the velocity is zero, so there is only gravitational time dilation.

For an arbitrary spacetime I think it is near hopeless to decompose the gravitational and velocity based parts.
 
I'd suggest focusing on round trips - computing "time dilation" requires that you specify how the clocks are going to be compared. If you do that via a round trip, it's automatically well defined. And it's also something concrete that you can measure, not something abstract.

For round trips, it's also easy (in principle) to calculate, given a metric and a path. You just integrate dtau, which you get from the metric, along the curve you travel, and that's the total elapsed time.

Given some specific coordinate system, you can think of the coefficient of g_00 as being a time dilation that makes your elapsed time for the trip less (compared to what it would be if g_00 was 1). And you can always think of space-like parts of the trip as subtracting from the Lorentz interval (so moving automatically makes your elapsed time less).
 
ok, well in all cases assume that the observer is at Earth and "you" (the traveler) are flying away from Earth to the massive object.

so it seems that the schwarzschild metric describes total time dilation for both velocity and gravitational time dilation in these cases. is this a correct statement?
 
The metric allows you to calculate your trip time, and the elapsed time for other observers - or pretty much any other measurement you want to make.
 
pervect said:
The metric allows you to calculate your trip time, and the elapsed time for other observers - or pretty much any other measurement you want to make.

so that's a yes to the question above your last post?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 79 ·
3
Replies
79
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
6K
  • · Replies 88 ·
3
Replies
88
Views
8K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
7K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
6K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
7K