Time dilation due to SR plus GR

powerplayer
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
So I've been trying to find an equation that will represent total time dilation.

I've looked through a couple threads and it seems the consensus of the threads I've seen on the topic say that total time dilation is the product of time dilation due to velocity and gravity. But I'm not clear on it and would like to be sure.

Here are a few example situations that I'd like to know how the total time dilation worked:

1. Your traveling straight with a very high velocity and you pass a massive object with close proximity.

2. You orbit a massive object with high velocity.

3. you travel at high velocity with no gravity effecting you.

4. you maintain 0 velocity in a strong gravitational field.

are there any equations(or derived equations) that will describe the total time dilation for all these situations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
powerplayer said:
So I've been trying to find an equation that will represent total time dilation.

I've looked through a couple threads and it seems the consensus of the threads I've seen on the topic say that total time dilation is the product of time dilation due to velocity and gravity. But I'm not clear on it and would like to be sure.

Here are a few example situations that I'd like to know how the total time dilation worked:

1. Your traveling straight with a very high velocity and you pass a massive object with close proximity.

2. You orbit a massive object with high velocity.

3. you travel at high velocity with no gravity effecting you.

4. you maintain 0 velocity in a strong gravitational field.

are there any equations(or derived equations) that will describe the total time dilation for all these situations?
For cases 1 and 2 you can use the Schwarzschild solution. If you are interested in the velocity with respect to static observers you can decompose the gravitational and velocity based time dilation. Thus the velocity with respect to arbitrary observers simply becomes a calculation.

For case 3 you would have to describe the velocity with respect to something else as there is no such thing as absolute velocity. Of course in all cases the gravitational part would be zero.

For case 4 you have to be more specific. In case of the Schwarzschild solution it is simple because if we take the velocity with respect to stationary observers the velocity is zero, so there is only gravitational time dilation.

For an arbitrary spacetime I think it is near hopeless to decompose the gravitational and velocity based parts.
 
I'd suggest focusing on round trips - computing "time dilation" requires that you specify how the clocks are going to be compared. If you do that via a round trip, it's automatically well defined. And it's also something concrete that you can measure, not something abstract.

For round trips, it's also easy (in principle) to calculate, given a metric and a path. You just integrate dtau, which you get from the metric, along the curve you travel, and that's the total elapsed time.

Given some specific coordinate system, you can think of the coefficient of g_00 as being a time dilation that makes your elapsed time for the trip less (compared to what it would be if g_00 was 1). And you can always think of space-like parts of the trip as subtracting from the Lorentz interval (so moving automatically makes your elapsed time less).
 
ok, well in all cases assume that the observer is at Earth and "you" (the traveler) are flying away from Earth to the massive object.

so it seems that the schwarzschild metric describes total time dilation for both velocity and gravitational time dilation in these cases. is this a correct statement?
 
The metric allows you to calculate your trip time, and the elapsed time for other observers - or pretty much any other measurement you want to make.
 
pervect said:
The metric allows you to calculate your trip time, and the elapsed time for other observers - or pretty much any other measurement you want to make.

so that's a yes to the question above your last post?
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...

Similar threads

Replies
36
Views
4K
Replies
46
Views
4K
Replies
88
Views
7K
Replies
58
Views
5K
Replies
18
Views
1K
Back
Top