Time dilation in gravitational field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a challenging problem related to time dilation in gravitational fields, specifically concerning GPS satellites. The task involves proving a specific expression that relates the time experienced on Earth's surface to that experienced by satellites, factoring in gravitational effects. The user has attempted various edits to the provided equations but has not made progress in proving the expression. They express uncertainty about the theoretical concepts needed to approach the problem effectively. The conversation highlights the complexities of applying relativity to practical scenarios like GPS technology.
Wingeer
Messages
76
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I recently had a test in the theory of relativity, and there was one task which I could not solve. This one has bothered me since the day I had the test.
It was a compound task about GPS-satellites.
There is no tricky calculations, or anything like that. The task aims at proving an expression.

\frac{{t_e }}{{\sqrt {1 - \frac{{2\gamma M}}{{c^2 r}}} }} = \frac{{t_s }}{{\sqrt{1 - \frac{{2\gamma M}}{{c^2 (r + h)}}} }}\

Where {t_e }\ is the time on Earth's surface, {t_s }\ is the time for the satellite, r is the radius from the center of Earth to the surface.

Homework Equations



\tau = \sqrt {1 - \frac{{2\gamma M}}{{c^2 r}}} t\

The Attempt at a Solution


I've tried a lot of editing these expressions, but it didn't get me anywhere. I really do not now how to prove the expression. I do imagine that there are some theory I need to figure, so that I can do something quirky with the expressions or something.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh. It looks like something happened to the LaTex-codes. Any ideas of what to do?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top