Time dilation - Lorentz transformation using light clock

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the time dilation formula using the Pythagorean theorem and light clocks. The user initially misapplies the relationship between the distances and times in different frames of reference, leading to an incorrect formula. It is clarified that the observer measures the clock moving a distance vt' rather than vt. After receiving feedback, the user acknowledges the mistake and confirms that the understanding is now correct. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurately defining frames of reference in relativistic physics.
kapitan90
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am trying to derive the time dilation formula using Pythagorean theorem:
L = ct (in clocks rest frame)
D = ct'(in observer's frame, the clock moving with velocity u)

The Attempt at a Solution



So D^2 = L^2 +v^2t^2
c^2{t'}^2=c^2t^2+u^2t^2
Sot'=t*\sqrt{1+v^2/c^2}
but it should be
t'=t/\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}

Homework Equations


This would work if D=ct, not ct' and L=ct', but I guess it isn't right with my choice of frames of reference?

Sources: http://www.drphysics.com/syllabus/time/time.html
 

Attachments

  • fig1.GIF
    fig1.GIF
    2.4 KB · Views: 532
Physics news on Phys.org
kapitan90 said:
This would work if D=ct, not ct' and L=ct', but I guess it isn't right with my choice of frames of reference?
You're mixing up your frames a bit. The clock moves a distance vt' (not vt) in the observer's frame. (The observer uses his own time measurements, of course.)
 
Ok, now it works, thanks for your reply!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top