I Time Dilation Paradox: Geosynchronous Satellites

InquiringMind
Messages
13
Reaction score
1
Time moves faster when higher above the earth. Time move slower the faster you are moving. A geosynchronous satellite has to be very high to be geosynchronous so it's time should be fast, but it also has to be orbiting the earth extremely fast to keep up with a geosynchronous position, so it's time should be slow. This seems like a paradox to me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
InquiringMind said:
This seems like a paradox to me.
Why? It's just two competing effects.
 
  • Like
Likes malawi_glenn, Vanadium 50 and Dale
InquiringMind said:
A geosynchronous satellite has to be very high to be geosynchronous so it's time should be fast
In that case the gravitational effect wins over the kinematic effect

Time_Dilation_vs_Orbital_Height.png
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes vanhees71, anorlunda, pinball1970 and 2 others
InquiringMind said:
Time moves faster when higher above the earth. Time move slower the faster you are moving
Just to be sure you are clear, neither one of these statements is true as an absolute statement. What you have left out is "relative to <something>". That is, your time ALWAYS moves at one second per second no matter where you are in a gravity well or how fast you are moving relative to something else.

Time APPEARS, to a different observer, to move a differing rates relative to that observer's rate, depending on relative depth in a gravity well and relative speed.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970, Dale and Ibix
InquiringMind said:
Time moves faster when higher above the earth. Time move slower the faster you are moving. A geosynchronous satellite has to be very high to be geosynchronous so it's time should be fast, but it also has to be orbiting the earth extremely fast to keep up with a geosynchronous position, so it's time should be slow. This seems like a paradox to me.
If you eat too much food, you put on weight. If you exercise a lot, you lose weight. If you eat a lot and exercise a lot you should put on weight and you should lose weight. Is that a paradox too?
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes vanhees71, malawi_glenn, Dale and 3 others
InquiringMind said:
it also has to be orbiting the earth extremely fast to keep up with a geosynchronous position
Free-fall orbital speed decreases with altitude.
 
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
391
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
54
Views
3K
Replies
103
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
36
Views
4K
Replies
44
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top